Hi John,
On Sun Nov 27, 2022 at 08:51 +, john tatt via epel-devel wrote:
> Hi everyoneI'll like to have Compiz / Emerald available on RHEL/Rocky aso
>
> is there a chance for this to happen ?
> Thank you
Please follow the standard EPEL Package Request[1] procedure and let us
Hi everyoneI'll like to have Compiz / Emerald available on RHEL/Rocky aso
is there a chance for this to happen ?
Thank you
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le
The problem is that compiz-reloaded (0.88) has several adjustments for MATE
desktop, eg. gtk-theme reloading during theme switching, desktop shortcuts,
special theme page in ccsm, etc.
I don't want lost this for users of mate-compiz spin.
For privat reasons i don't have the time in the next 2
Good to know, thanks for answer. Can we package then separate compat version
with 0.9 version? Still WIP build [1] but fully working. And already filed some
bugs [2] upstream.
[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/compiz0.9/
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1923481
The official fedora spin requires compiz-0.88. compiz-0.88 is under active
development and does perfectly match Mate-desktop.
In the past gnome itself decided not to use compiz in favor of mutter.
As Mate spin owner i am against to update compiz only because of gnome-flash,
which was never
Hello. I'd like to package new Compiz 0.9. New version required for GNOME
Flashback [1] and also have some other nice improvements like CCSM ported on
GTK3. Currently Compiz 0.8 packaged in Fedora. The question is: should i send
PR with update current Compiz 0.8 -> 0.9 or should i made com
cking my switch: compiz.
> I really need it for my work flow, and I use it on my other machines running
> Fedora and it works perfectly.
> Is there any chance that it gets packaged in EPEL? who do I need to contact?
> I'm willing to help
Hello everyone,
I've been trying to switch one of my machines from Debian to CentOS 8 lately,
but one thing is blocking my switch: compiz.
I really need it for my work flow, and I use it on my other machines running
Fedora and it works perfectly.
Is there any chance that it gets packaged
I just orphaned whole the compiz stack.
- compiz
- compiz-plugins-main
- compiz-plugins-extra
- compiz-plugins-experimental
- compiz-manager
- compizconfig-python
- compiz-bcop
- emerald
- emerald-themes
- fusion-icon
- ccsm
- simple-ccsm
I don't use those packages for myself any more and i
Hi all,
Im using centos 7+ epel + xfce.
do you have any plans to add these compiz/emerald packages for el7
desktop users?
I tested the packages and currently it working well, may it helps when
you decide to add these packages.
Those packages needed and *not yet provided by epel
to maintain these or any
direct interest in them - they were just Unity building blocks to me.
I'm orphaning these packages:
bamf
compiz-plugins-main (for f16 only)
dee
libindicator
Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So
someone interested in gwibber might want to pick
On 11/01/2012 06:06 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
And whoever want to install unity or these packages, can just use
GNOME:Ayatana from the open build service :)
Unfortunately that replaces many important components with forked
versions. If it was a pure add-on repository, that would be ok.
Rahul
On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So
someone interested in gwibber might want to pick up dee.
I'll take dee, although, gwibber will never progress past 3.6, because
the upstream (Canonical) plan is to convert gwibber
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So
someone interested in gwibber might want to pick up dee.
I'll take dee, although, gwibber will never
- Original Message -
I currently own a few packages related to my old abortive attempt to
build Unity for Fedora. I don't have time to maintain these or any
direct interest in them - they were just Unity building blocks to me.
I'm orphaning these packages:
bamf
compiz-plugins-main
On 11/01/2012 09:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
mailto:tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So
someone
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/01/2012 09:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
mailto:tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Only
I currently own a few packages related to my old abortive attempt to
build Unity for Fedora. I don't have time to maintain these or any
direct interest in them - they were just Unity building blocks to me.
I'm orphaning these packages:
bamf
compiz-plugins-main (for f16 only)
dee
libindicator
Hi,
i've re-retired the compiz package.
There are some old user acl's for rawhide.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/compiz?_csrf_token=d92e6e7618be26b35f4fda2321a71f4e540a37f9
user:
ajax
alexl
caillon
caolanm
davidz
hadess
hicham
johnp
jrb
mbarnes
mclasen
rhughes
rnorwood
rstrode
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 14:58 +0200, Rave it wrote:
Hi,
i've re-retired the compiz package.
There are some old user acl's for rawhide.
[...]
Are you really interest to keep your acl's for compiz?
Pls reply, otherwise i assume i can delete your rights.
You can delete them all. They're
Hi Everybody,
In fedora 17 we see no compiz, because of some conflicts with
boost-serialization. and of cource new compiz (0.9.x) are really buggy!
show blank screen when you use Desktop Cube and some other really bad bugs.
So i just figure out what other folks in Archlinux did about this, yes
Actually the 0.8 tree is still the stable tree... the 0.9.x (glib
mainloop) is the unstable one, and yes it is a nightmare and somehow
unpredictable. It's a nice thing to see 0.8.x returning :)
2012/6/22 Bersam K bersa...@gmail.com:
Hi Everybody,
In fedora 17 we see no compiz, because of some
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 15:12 +0430, Bersam K wrote:
Hi Everybody,
In fedora 17 we see no compiz, because of some conflicts with
boost-serialization. and of cource new compiz (0.9.x) are really
buggy! show blank screen when you use Desktop Cube and some other
really bad bugs.
Well those
Adam Williamson wrote:
Well those are two reasons. The more important third reason is that
no-one wants to maintain compiz. I don't want to, and drago01 doesn't
want to any more, that's why he orphaned it. Whether it's 0.8 or 0.9, we
just don't want to spend the time on it. If you want
Hi,
I have stopped using compiz a while ago and didn't really have much
time to maintain it (it has a lots of open bugs) I decided that
it is probably better to hand it over to someone else who has more
time and actually still uses it.
It has lots abrt of bugs open some of them are bugs inside
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:56 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Marko,
glad to see compiz working for you. In the meanwhile I found this bug
already reported:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653085
So anybody please join in if you have
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:57 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:56 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Marko,
glad to see compiz working for you. In the meanwhile I found this bug
already reported
On Monday, January 24, 2011 02:06:50 am Kevin Kofler wrote:
You can run systemsettings from a terminal or a run command interface.
(I think we should reconsider the decision of having KDE's System Settings
only shown in the menu in KDE/Plasma sessions, I'll bring this up in our
KDE SIG
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Björn Persson wrote:
As an example, Kmail and Kate recently started making noises in certain
situations, when displaying dialog boxes and the like, even though I had
sound effects turned off.
In that case, they were always supposed to make those event sounds, there
Kevin Kofler wrote:
It's really rude to force
users to reconfigure everything when they upgrade to a new Fedora just
because upstream couldn't be bothered to migrate settings properly (and I
hate upstreams doing that).
I agree with that, and it's still annoying even if it's not literally
Björn Persson wrote:
I agree with that, and it's still annoying even if it's not literally
everything that must be reconfigured.
Right, but:
As an example, Kmail and Kate recently started making noises in certain
situations, when displaying dialog boxes and the like, even though I had
sound
in Fedora. I'm afraid you'll have to re-do your
configuration with the 0.9 switch, if you have a custom compiz
configuration; sorry about that.
I think this is really unhelpful. If Ubuntu has patches to migrate
configuration automatically, we should ship them. It's really rude to force
users
Adam Williamson wrote:
and I would need an exception to the 'no-non-upstreamed-patches' policy to
ship those patches.
That's not a policy, it's a purely indicative guideline which states very
clearly that there are many reasons why patches can be needed. It's purely
the
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote:
In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
* desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic
with the 0.9 switch, if you have a custom compiz
configuration; sorry about that.
I think this is really unhelpful. If Ubuntu has patches to migrate
configuration automatically, we should ship them. It's really rude to force
users to reconfigure everything when they upgrade to a new Fedora just
because
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote:
In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
* desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice
you use for launching compiz sets the
'gconf'
parameter instead of 'ccp'. The compiz-gtk script which most people
probably wind up using, one way or another, to launch compiz now
specifies 'ccp' not 'gconf'. I have tested the 'ccp' configuration
method quite carefully and can report
reason. If you do, you'll have
to
make sure whatever method you use for launching compiz sets the
'gconf'
parameter instead of 'ccp'. The compiz-gtk script which most people
probably wind up using, one way or another, to launch compiz now
specifies 'ccp' not 'gconf'. I have tested the 'ccp
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
configure compiz!' was one of the most popular bug reports (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532229 ). I can't really
think of a really good way to set this up, especially given that the
compiz user base seems split
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
for now I'm going to at least see if I can get a 'pure-gconf' setup to
work with ccsm.
well, I think I have this going now. the question now is whether to
force gconf on all compiz users...I think I'll update the bug report
Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows
ccsm-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.noarch.rpm
compiz-0.9.2.2-0.8.git619abc05b1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
compizconfig-python-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
compiz-plugins-main-0.9.2.1-4.fc15.x86_64.rpm
fusion-icon-0.1.0-0.9.5e2dc9git.fc15.noarch.rpm
fusion-icon-gtk
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 04:47 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows
emerald-0.8.4-7.fc15.x86_64.rpm
That's the old, un-fixed emerald build - it must not have made it into
the last compose. The fixed build is
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
Just upgraded to the latest and greatest. Most of compiz seems to work
properly. However, ccsm-0.9.2.1-1 now crashes when I try to
set command key bindings. Reverting to ccsm-0.8.4-5 did not solve the
problem.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
* desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at
the login manager you can use to get a GNOME 2 + Compiz-style desktop
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 00:13 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
* desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at
the login manager
Quick note for Rawhide users: I am in the process of landing Compiz 0.9
now. Adel and I have been testing the 0.9 migration in a side repo -
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/Compiz09/compiz09/ - for a while
now, and we're happy it's working pretty well. Note that we're using the
upstream
Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE?
Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and
modifying lxsession to use compiz rather than fusion icon left me
without window decorations and a usable mouse
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 16:11 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE?
Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and
modifying lxsession to use compiz rather than fusion icon left me
without window decorations
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 00:34 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 16:11 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE?
Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and
modifying lxsession to use compiz
I have to agree with there being too many way to launch compiz. I've
decided I like having the fusion-icon applet in the panel, so I'll wait
to see what you've been able to do with fusion-icon. Compiz-gtk wants to
pull in 13 new packages - that's 13 too many, especially when one of
them (metacity
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 17:49 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
I have to agree with there being too many way to launch compiz. I've
decided I like having the fusion-icon applet in the panel, so I'll wait
to see what you've been able to do with fusion-icon. Compiz-gtk wants to
pull in 13 new
51 matches
Mail list logo
