On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> I've been there, keeping Ruby .spec file in sync with upstream
> development, and my decision was always to drop the detailed changelog
> and replace it just with single entry. In the end, in the development
> stream, there are many times
I've been there, keeping Ruby .spec file in sync with upstream
development, and my decision was always to drop the detailed changelog
and replace it just with single entry. In the end, in the development
stream, there are many times mentioned just updates to some snapshots,
temporary workarounds
Hello,
For a few months now and in order to help upstreams find bugs and test
new features I have been maintaining in copr development versions of a
couple of my packages, namely pre-release versions of Molsketch and
development snapshots of SciDAVis built against Qt5. At the same time,
I have
