Re: Copr && Rawhide -- no "rolling updates" workflow

2016-10-13 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 13.10.2016 v 09:37 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: >> The description of Kevin is very precise. I am additionally thinking about >> implementing >> user option to rebuild all project packages for a new target when added. So >> when f27 is added,

Re: Copr && Rawhide -- no "rolling updates" workflow

2016-10-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > The description of Kevin is very precise. I am additionally thinking about > implementing > user option to rebuild all project packages for a new target when added. So > when f27 is added, user could click one button to launch rebuild of all

Re: Copr && Rawhide -- no "rolling updates" workflow

2016-10-13 Thread Michal Novotny
The description of Kevin is very precise. I am additionally thinking about implementing user option to rebuild all project packages for a new target when added. So when f27 is added, user could click one button to launch rebuild of all his packages for this target. Basically, this allows us to be

Re: Copr && Rawhide -- no "rolling updates" workflow

2016-10-12 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 01:11:42PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Personally, I would say we shouldn't do any mass rebuilding. > If a project gets to the point where it has no builds for any active > targets we could move it to a 'archive' or just delete it as it would > indicate no one is driving/ca

Re: Copr && Rawhide -- no "rolling updates" workflow

2016-10-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:50:08 -0500 Bowen Wang wrote: > So it means that there will be no longer Rawhide version of Fedora, or > it is just a change of repo/target name. This is only about what/how copr is going to build against rawhide. Fedora rawhide is not going anywhere but onward. ;) kev

Re: Copr && Rawhide -- no "rolling updates" workflow

2016-10-12 Thread Bowen Wang
So it means that there will be no longer Rawhide version of Fedora, or it is just a change of repo/target name. Bowen On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 01:11:42PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:14:34 +0200 > Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > FYI: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?

Re: Copr && Rawhide -- no "rolling updates" workflow

2016-10-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:14:34 +0200 Pavel Raiskup wrote: > FYI: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381790 > > Seems like the `fedora-rawhide-x86_64` chroot is not going to exist > from now, which is IMO unnecessary change ... but what could be other > than those "obvious" consequences

Copr && Rawhide -- no "rolling updates" workflow

2016-10-11 Thread Pavel Raiskup
FYI: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381790 Seems like the `fedora-rawhide-x86_64` chroot is not going to exist from now, which is IMO unnecessary change ... but what could be other than those "obvious" consequences for both Copr repo maintainers and users? Does this sound like accept