Re: Different behaviour on gcc 4.6?

2011-06-11 Thread Christoph Frieben
2011/6/11 Sergio Belkin: /* confdefs.h */ #define PACKAGE_NAME UpTools #define PACKAGE_TARNAME UpTools #define PACKAGE_VERSION 8.5.5 #define PACKAGE_STRING UpTools 8.5.5 #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT bugs-upto...@palermo.edu #define PACKAGE_URL #define PACKAGE UpTools #define VERSION 8.5.5

Re: Different behaviour on gcc 4.6?

2011-06-10 Thread Sergio Belkin
Sorry, I was typing on a netbook :P and the mail it was sent without subject -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Different behaviour on gcc 4.6?

2011-06-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Sergio Belkin wrote: | int | { | |; |return 0; | } This is not a valid C program. Maybe GCC 4.5 accepted this junk?! GCC 4.6 is right to error on it. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Different behaviour on gcc 4.6?

2011-06-10 Thread Sergio Belkin
2011/6/10 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at: Sergio Belkin wrote: | int | { | |; |return 0; | } This is not a valid C program. Maybe GCC 4.5 accepted this junk?! GCC 4.6 is right to error on it.        Kevin Kofler -- Thanks Kevin, but not so fast ;) ! it was my fault, I've