On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:32:29 -0500 (EST) Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I've posted a comparison between Sphinx and Dexy [1] - as well as > > updated the phabricator ticket [2]. The tools are pretty similar in > > what they can produce, so it really comes down to what people are > > comfortable with. The learning curve for Dexy isn't steep, and I > > think it's just enough easier to use compared to Sphinx for our > > purposes. > > I wondered why I hadn't seen it at Fedora Planet (neither your > previous blogpost), and it's because your RSS feed is no longer > updated: http://roshi.fedorapeople.org/feeds/fedora.atom.xml > > > > I wasn't able to find air-tight reasoning for one over the other for > > qa-devel work - but found dexy a bit easier to use and template. > > Source for both tutorials can be found on my bitbucket profile [3]. > > Thanks. Can you move it into our team repo list? > https://bitbucket.org/fedoraqa > > > > > > // Roshi > > > > [1] http://roshi.fedorapeople.org/comparing-dexy-and-sphinx.html > > [2] https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T39 > > [3] https://bitbucket.org/Rorosha/doc-tools > > > _______________________________________________ > qa-devel mailing list > qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel I've fixed the RSS issue. As for moving the repo - I think it makes more sense to move the tutorial source to taskotron (instead of the team repo list) once we decide the tool we want to use for docs - Unless there's a real need for the demo to be on the team page that I'm not seeing. // Roshi
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
