Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
sudo dnf --releasever=33 --setopt=module_platform
On Friday, October 2, 2020 8:50:19 AM WEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
> ...
In one machine I got this:
Problem 1: problem with installed package sugar-recall-6-4.fc31.noarch
- sugar-recall-6-4.fc31.noarch do
On 02. 10. 20 10:59, José Abílio Matos wrote:
The first really looks like a bug. I do not see any reason for a package to
require python 3.3. The most likely explanation is a typo.
Or a broken sed in %prep:
sed -i 's/python/python3/' *.py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187163
On 02. 10. 20 10:59, José Abílio Matos wrote:
Problem 2: package hippo-canvas-0.3.0-28.fc30.x86_64 requires
libcroco-0.6.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- libcroco-0.6.13-3.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed packag
On Friday, October 2, 2020 10:04:34 AM WEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Or a broken sed in %prep:
>
> sed -i 's/python/python3/' *.py
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871631
You are right, I arrived to the same conclusion. The sed call was required
with previous versions but suga
On Friday, October 2, 2020 10:05:11 AM WEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 10. 20 10:59, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> > Problem 2: package hippo-canvas-0.3.0-28.fc30.x86_64 requires
> >
> > libcroco-0.6.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> >
> >- libcroco-0.6.13-3.fc32.x8
* Miroslav Suchý:
> Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf module reset '*'
>
> sudo dnf --relea
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package
qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.14.2-1.fc32.x86_64
- qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.14.2-1.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- nothing provides qt5-qtwebengine(x86-64) = 5.15.0 needed by
qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.15.0-2.fc33.x86
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 6:30 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: problem with installed package
> qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.14.2-1.fc32.x86_64
> - qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.14.2-1.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a
> distupgrade repository
> - nothing provides qt5-qtwebengine(x86-6
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 09:50:19AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please
> report it against the appropriate package.
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package mosquitto-1.6.10-1.fc32.x86_64
- mosquitto-1.6.10-1.fc32.x
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 09:50:19AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
Congratulations, this is overall the most problem-free upgrade I've
encountered at the beta stage!
On two different F32 x86_64 servers, a
On Friday, October 2, 2020 3:50:19 AM EDT Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> dnf --releasever=33 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f33 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \
> distro-sync
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package umbrello-19.12.2-1.fc32.x86_
I've got a weird one:
Error:
Problem 1: package openssh-ldap-debuginfo-8.3p1-3.fc32.x86_64
requires openssh-debuginfo(x86-64) = 8.3p1-3.fc32, but none of the
providers can be installed
- openssh-debuginfo-8.3p1-3.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- problem with installed
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 1:50 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
I get a handful of downgrades:
Downgrading:
appstream-data noarch 32-7.fc33fedora 17 M
mod_http2
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 3:59 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package mosquitto-1.6.10-1.fc32.x86_64
- mosquitto-1.6.10-1.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
r
Take some time but All went smothly, so the unique problem I found was
with the following two packed I've had to remove:
1. copyq
Error:
Problema: conflicting requests
- nothing provides qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.14.2 needed by copyq-3.12.0-
4.fc33.x86_64
2. openjfx - I've remove it and then insta
On 02. 10. 20 16:05, Alexander Scheel wrote:
I've got a weird one:
Error:
Problem 1: package openssh-ldap-debuginfo-8.3p1-3.fc32.x86_64
requires openssh-debuginfo(x86-64) = 8.3p1-3.fc32, but none of the
providers can be installed
- openssh-debuginfo-8.3p1-3.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a
>Problem 1: package copydeps-4.0-3.fc32.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.8, but
>none of the providers can be installed
> - python3-3.8.5-5.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> - problem with installed package copydeps-4.0-3.fc32.noarch
This is because copydeps has been rewri
During an attempted upgrade to F33 Beta I ran into:
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib/.build-id/0e/fd9f1f23d7cefd37989b7d1b401b4994fee742 conflicts
between attempted installs of openjfx-11.0.3-1.fc33.x86_64 and
openjfx8-8.0.202-24.b07.fc33.x86_64
file /usr/lib/.build-id/2d/747b771
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 08:01:16AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> Problem 2: package python2-libxml2-2.9.10-4.fc31.x86_64 requires
> libxml2(x86-64) = 2.9.10-4.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed
> - libxml2-2.9.10-4.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> - pro
On 05. 10. 20 9:30, Petr Pisar wrote:
Problem 3: package irssi-1.2.2-6.fc33.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.32()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.32.0-462.fc33.x86_64 and
perl-libs-4:5.30.3-455.fc31.x86_64
- problem with installed packa
Error:
Problem: package mbrowse-0.4.3-20.fc31.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- net-snmp-libs-1:5.8-25.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- problem with installed package mbrowse-0.4.3-20.fc31.x86_64
--
Tom
On Fr, 2020-10-02 at 09:50 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf m
Hey!
while upgrading I get this error :
Problem: package nodejs-grunt-1.0.4-4.fc33.noarch requires (npm(rimraf) >= 2.0
with npm(rimraf) < 3), but none of the providers can be installed
- package nodejs-grunt-cli-1.2.0-9.fc32.noarch requires npm(grunt), but none
of the providers can be installe
On 10/2/20 3:50 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
sudo dnf --releasever=33 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f33 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \
distro-sync
F
Dne 03. 10. 20 v 23:28 Tom Seewald napsal(a):
> Error: Transaction test error:
> file /usr/lib/.build-id/0e/fd9f1f23d7cefd37989b7d1b401b4994fee742 conflicts
> between attempted installs of openjfx-11.0.3-1.fc33.x86_64 and
> openjfx8-8.0.202-24.b07.fc33.x86_64
> file /usr/lib/.build-id/2d/747b
26 matches
Mail list logo
