Excerpts from Kevin Kofler's message of Tue Nov 22 19:24:22 +0100 2011:
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I wouldn't want to get rid of the ownership model altogether, I think
there should be a specific person responsible for handling bug
reports/RFEs. When a group is responsible to handle something
What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current
package ownership model?
Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence would
make every contributor an proven packager?
Would it be viable to move to something like language SIG based
ownership of packages?
2011/11/22 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current
package ownership model?
Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence would
make every contributor an proven packager?
Allowing any packager to commit to
On 11/22/2011 05:59 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2011/11/22 Jóhann B. Guðmundssonjohan...@gmail.com:
What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current
package ownership model?
Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence would
make every contributor an proven
Subject: Dropping the ownership model
What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current
package ownership model?
Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence
would
make every contributor an proven packager?
Well, everyone becoming a proven packager
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I wouldn't want to get rid of the ownership model altogether, I think
there should be a specific person responsible for handling bug
reports/RFEs. When a group is responsible to handle something not
really pleasant to do, often no single member of that group feels
On 11/22/2011 06:51 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current
package ownership model?
ownership = responsibility
Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence would
make every contributor an proven packager?
No.
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:51:31 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current
package ownership model?
Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence
would make every contributor an proven packager?
Subject: Dropping the ownership model
What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current
package ownership model?
Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence
would
make every contributor an proven packager?
Well, everyone becoming a proven packager
2011/11/22 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current
package ownership model?
I can't speak for anyone else. But for me I'm more than willing to see
other contributors work with me to fix things in packages that I
own. I'll even
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:51:31 +, JBG (Jóhann) wrote:
What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current
package ownership model?
Understand a package's owners as some sort of micro-SIG. The people who
sign up as a package's team of owners are the ones who want to be
On 11/22/2011 06:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:51:31 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundssonjohan...@gmail.com wrote:
What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current
package ownership model?
Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence
would
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 13:20 -0500, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Would it be practical to dropping it altogether which in essence
would
make every contributor an proven packager?
Well, everyone becoming a proven packager is going too far from the
beginning.
Though I have to say that
* Jóhann B. Guðmundsson [22/11/2011 19:28] :
What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current
package ownership model?
Pro: it enforces responsibility. The way things currently work, it's
relatively obvious whose work it is to fix a given bug.
Con: the thing that kicked off
tis 2011-11-22 klockan 17:51 + skrev Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
What do people see as pros and cons continuing to use the current
package ownership model?
ownership is some times misappropriated with others doing all the work,
but it's also of little practical meaning in the end.
Would
15 matches
Mail list logo
