Re: ELN Reasons (was Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy)

2020-05-13 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
Hi, Neal, On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 9:24 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 8:04 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:56 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > I have several reasons against ELN, which I have already stated for past > > > versions of your proposal

Re: ELN Reasons (was Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy)

2020-05-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 8:04 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:56 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > I have several reasons against ELN, which I have already stated for past > > versions of your proposal (Should I really have repeated those at every > > single revised version

Re: ELN Reasons (was Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy)

2020-05-13 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 5:01:29 AM MST Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > * Having a buildroot called "EL Next" means that Fedora gets in the > > business > > > of composing the development version of RHEL in addition to the > > development version of Fedora. I do not see how this is the job of > >

Re: ELN Reasons (was Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy)

2020-05-13 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:01:29AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > * Having a buildroot called "EL Next" means that Fedora gets in the business > > of composing the development version of RHEL in addition to the > > development version of Fedora. I do not see how this is the job of Fedora

ELN Reasons (was Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy)

2020-05-13 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:56 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > I have several reasons against ELN, which I have already stated for past > versions of your proposal (Should I really have repeated those at every > single revised version that you came up with to bypass the repeated > rejection?): > * Having