Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2013-01-03 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:21 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > Should I search for 'e17' if I want it? > > It is not in the repo yet if you see the mail I sent Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2013-01-03 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:47 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky > wrote: >> >> This is E17, right? E16 is already there, isn't it? > > > Yes. From a packaging stand point, they don't have anything in common > > Rahul > > -- > devel mailing l

Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2013-01-02 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:47 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > This is E17, right? E16 is already there, isn't it? > Yes. From a packaging stand point, they don't have anything in common Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2013-01-02 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
This is E17, right? E16 is already there, isn't it? On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Edward Mann wrote: > On 02.01.2013 08:12, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > Forgot to add > > Elementary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891282 > Efreet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c

Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2013-01-02 Thread Edward Mann
On 02.01.2013 08:12, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > Forgot to add > > Elementary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891282 [10] Efreet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890909 [11] > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Hi >> >> As of now, I ha

Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2013-01-02 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi Forgot to add Elementary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891282 Efreet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890909 On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > As of now, I have submitted Enlightenment and all it dependencies for > review.

Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2013-01-02 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi As of now, I have submitted Enlightenment and all it dependencies for review. evas-generic-loaders has already been approved and built for Rawhide. Rest of them are listed below. Thanks to Edward Mann, Emmanuel Seyman, Michael Scherer, Terje and others who have helped out with this effor

Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2012-12-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 12/29/2012 01:23 AM, Vascom wrote: Are you plan package only stable versions or versionf from SVN? For now, the focus is to get the packages through the review process. SVN builds can be scripted if there is sufficient interest Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2012-12-28 Thread Vascom
Are you plan package only stable versions or versionf from SVN? 2012/12/29 Rahul Sundaram > Hi > > I am working on bringing in Enlightenment back into Fedora. I am going to > be copying the packages at > > http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/sundaram/enlightenment/ > > as I work on them. This

Enlightenment for Fedora

2012-12-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi I am working on bringing in Enlightenment back into Fedora. I am going to be copying the packages at http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/sundaram/enlightenment/ as I work on them. This would just be a temporary experimental repo. I have updated the existing dependencies in the Fedora repo