On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:22:37 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Correction:
Bug 1085761 looks like the main bug, should we marked bug 1185565 was
duplicated of 1085761 ?
The answer is found in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1185565#c2
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
yeah
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203046.html
but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085761
looks like the main bug 1185565 should be marked was duplicated of
1085761
On Ter, 2015-02-24 at 22:39 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
yeah
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203046.html
but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085761
Correction:
Bug 1085761 looks like the main bug, should we marked bug 1185565 was
duplicated of 1085761 ?
On Ter, 2015-02-24 at 22:39 +0800,
I'm working on a couple of reviews and fedora-review has failed with some
errors:
$ fedora-review -u https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3551 -m
fedora-rawhide-x86_64
INFO: Processing bug on url:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3551
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203045.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1185565
May help.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
