Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-11 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:22:35PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Additionally, I have some RFE's too. ;) > > - Could you add a 'q' for quit or something. Or at least not catch > control-c? If I am in the middle of doing something and need to > reboot or wander off, I would perfer to be able to

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Additionally, I have some RFE's too. ;) - Could you add a 'q' for quit or something. Or at least not catch control-c? If I am in the middle of doing something and need to reboot or wander off, I would perfer to be able to just stop. - Perhaps also a 'n' and 'p' for next and previous ? If I

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-11 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Till Maas wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 04:51:34PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> The biggest query command I would like at the moment is something like: >> >> fedora-easy-karma --list # lists packages to be voted on. >> fedora-easy-karma --list-new # l

Re: Install fedora-easy-karma by default? (was: Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism)

2010-03-11 Thread Thomas Janssen
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said: >> > Also thanks for packaging that immediately -- what about installing it >> > by default? It's a tiny package and we really do want our users to >> > provide feedback. >> >> I do not mind, if it is

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-11 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 04:51:34PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > The biggest query command I would like at the moment is something like: > > fedora-easy-karma --list # lists packages to be voted on. > fedora-easy-karma --list-new # list pacakges I haven't voted on already. fedora-easy-kar

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-10 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:34:15AM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> 1) Comments could allow for multi-line code. I tried to paste stuff in >> and well skipped a couple of packages from the paste :) > > Do you have any wish about how this s

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-10 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:34:15AM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > 1) Comments could allow for multi-line code. I tried to paste stuff in > and well skipped a couple of packages from the paste :) Do you have any wish about how this should behave? I was thinking that e.g. a comment like " 2)

Re: Install fedora-easy-karma by default? (was: Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism)

2010-03-10 Thread Bill Nottingham
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said: > > Also thanks for packaging that immediately -- what about installing it > > by default? It's a tiny package and we really do want our users to > > provide feedback. > > I do not mind, if it is installed by default, but I am not sure, > whether this is a

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-10 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Till Maas wrote: > Good news everyone, > > you can probably expect to receive more positive bodhi karma for your > updates in the future (or you already got unexpected much), because > there is now a script called 'fedora-easy-karma'[0], that makes > providing feedb

Install fedora-easy-karma by default? (was: Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism)

2010-03-10 Thread Till Maas
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 01:29:28AM +0100, Milos Jakubicek wrote: > Also thanks for packaging that immediately -- what about installing it > by default? It's a tiny package and we really do want our users to > provide feedback. I do not mind, if it is installed by default, but I am not sure, whe

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-10 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:51:52PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Till Maas wrote: > > You need to update packages from updates-testing first and then it's > > useful to run it. Please look at the wiki for example output. > > Would your script break, say, if he was using the bodhi-client from

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-09 Thread Mike Chambers
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:19 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > If you know which pkgs you've installed that were from updates-testing you > can run: > > > yumdb set from_repo updates-testing pkg_name > > and that should do it. Yes, that fixed it. So the name has to be "updates-testing" in the repo f

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-09 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Till Maas wrote: > You need to update packages from updates-testing first and then it's > useful to run it. Please look at the wiki for example output. Would your script break, say, if he was using the bodhi-client from updates-testing that is broken? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapro

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-09 Thread Seth Vidal
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:42:19PM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 14:06 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote: >>> Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:50 -0500 schrieb Stephen Gallagher: On 03/06/2010 05:21 PM, Till Maas wrote: > [0] https://

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-09 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 07:50:43AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Given the obvious utility of this script, can we get it added to the > fedora-packager package? It doesn't make a lot of sense to have > developers downloading a script off a wiki to use this. It's (going to be) in the fedora-pa

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-09 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:42:19PM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 14:06 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:50 -0500 schrieb Stephen Gallagher: > > > On 03/06/2010 05:21 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > > > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Easy_Karma

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-09 Thread Mike Chambers
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 14:06 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:50 -0500 schrieb Stephen Gallagher: > > On 03/06/2010 05:21 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Easy_Karma > > > > > > Given the obvious utility of this script, can we get it

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-09 Thread Thomas Spura
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:50 -0500 schrieb Stephen Gallagher: > On 03/06/2010 05:21 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Easy_Karma > > > Given the obvious utility of this script, can we get it added to the > fedora-packager package? It doesn't make a lot of se

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/2010 05:21 PM, Till Maas wrote: > Good news everyone, > > you can probably expect to receive more positive bodhi karma for your > updates in the future (or you already got unexpected much), because > there is now a script called 'fedora-easy-

Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-06 Thread Milos Jakubicek
On 6.3.2010 23:21, Till Maas wrote: > Good news everyone, > > you can probably expect to receive more positive bodhi karma for your > updates in the future (or you already got unexpected much), because > there is now a script called 'fedora-easy-karma'[0], that makes > providing feedback a lot easi

Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism

2010-03-06 Thread Till Maas
Good news everyone, you can probably expect to receive more positive bodhi karma for your updates in the future (or you already got unexpected much), because there is now a script called 'fedora-easy-karma'[0], that makes providing feedback a lot easier. This makes it more important to consider t