On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
Why xulrunner has been built against this and pushed to stable?
Because Firefox/Thunderbird maintainers have the ability to
Push-To-Stable regardless of what the Fedora package policies say.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Thomas Janssen
thom...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
rant
My security fix build was rejected going to stable directly, because
it could break anything (freeciv game), so i expect critical packages
for end users have to go trough as well.
/rant
The web browser is
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:05 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Thomas Janssen
thom...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
rant
My security fix build was rejected going to stable directly, because
it could break anything (freeciv game), so i expect critical packages
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Thomas Janssen
thom...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
File a ticket with FESCo. We should have *all* packages go trough
updates-testing, regardless of who's the maintainer or what's the
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:01:04 +0200,
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Thomas Janssen
thom...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
File a ticket with FESCo. We should have *all* packages go trough
updates-testing, regardless of who's the maintainer or
Hi all,
If I try to update F12 I get the following error:
# yum update
Plugin abilitati:presto, refresh-packagekit
Impostazione processo di aggiornamento
Risoluzione dipendenze
-- Esecuzione del controllo di transazione
--- Pacchetto firefox.x86_64 0:3.5.12-1.fc12 settato per essere
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
Why xulrunner has been built against this and pushed to stable?
Because Firefox/Thunderbird maintainers have the ability to
Push-To-Stable regardless of what the Fedora package policies say. Harrumph.
I have previously complained of this fact before when these packages
