Sorry I need to include a patch I sent recently to the list. Those
errors are bogus, btrfsck just needs to be taught about our special
space cache inodes. I'll pull that into fedora. You are right, you
don't need to run btrfsck on boot, just if you run into issues.
Thanks,
Josef
On Thu, Apr
On Apr 11, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Got it all updated, it's in koji, 0.19-18 is what you want. Thanks,
Thanks Josef. This is now available with a yum update and has fixed the
problem. However, this is what I get as a result.
I'm under the impression that a btrfsck isn't
Got it all updated, it's in koji, 0.19-18 is what you want. Thanks,
Josef
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
If it's only updated in rawhide, what will be the state of btrfs-progs in F17?
On Apr 10, 2012, at 7:10 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Hrm sorry, I
Hrm sorry, I need to update btrfs-progs in rawhide, I will try and get
to that today. Thanks,
Josef
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
I have an inconsequential F16 VM that uses btrfs. The VM went psycho for
unknown reasons and I had to force quit.
If it's only updated in rawhide, what will be the state of btrfs-progs in F17?
On Apr 10, 2012, at 7:10 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Hrm sorry, I need to update btrfs-progs in rawhide, I will try and get
to that today. Thanks,
Josef
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Chris Murphy
I have an inconsequential F16 VM that uses btrfs. The VM went psycho for
unknown reasons and I had to force quit. Realizing btrfsck can't fix a problem,
I was curious if it would see any problems. So I loaded the F16.vdi as a 2nd
SATA disk in an F17 VM. I get the following results:
[root@f17v
