2014-03-07 18:32 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy :
> On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>
>
>- For configuration: What we really want is a VCS, dealing with
>changesets, documenting who has changed what, when and why. Snapshots are
>a really poor VCS.
>
> Obviously we don't hav
On Mar 7, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 03/07/2014 09:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Chris Murphy
>>> wrote:
On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Ot
On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> 2014-03-07 14:31 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer :
> remember. It is only concerned with /usr and to as minimal a degree
> as possible /etc. People likely still want snapshot and rollback for
> their actual _data_ as well.
>
> (Choosing a random point
On 03/07/2014 09:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Other developers: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning
Release engineering: N/A (not
On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
Other developers: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning
Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Josh Boyer
wrote:
I don't think that's accurate. OSTree doesn't touch /home from what I
remember. It is only concerned with /usr and to as minimal a degree
as possible /etc. People likely still want snapshot and rollback for
their actual _data_ as well.
Exact
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
i don't think people *really* like to restore a snapshot of /usr
without /var/lib/rpm if they only know what that means at the end
On an rpm-ostree system, /var/lib/rpm is a symlink to /usr/share/rpm.
And that's only because I wanted to a
2014-03-07 14:31 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer :
> remember. It is only concerned with /usr and to as minimal a degree
> as possible /etc. People likely still want snapshot and rollback for
> their actual _data_ as well.
>
(Choosing a random point in the conversation...)
I'm starting to think that snap
Am 07.03.2014 14:31, schrieb Josh Boyer:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> I this project dead? I'm casting about to tools to manage lvm snapshots
>>> and roller-derby sounded promising. Any other tools out there?
>>
>> There's a recent snapshot/rollback thread on the
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>>> Other developers: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning
>>> Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>>> Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>>>
On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Other developers: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning
>> Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>> Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>>
>> [1]
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Installer
On 07/17/2013 04:39 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Snapshot and Rollback Tool =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rollback
Change owner(s): Stephen Gallagher , Colin Walters
With the advent of thinly-provisioned LVM pools, it has become possible for us
to imp
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Snapshot and Rollback Tool =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rollback
Change owner(s): Stephen Gallagher , Colin Walters
With the advent of thinly-provisioned LVM pools, it has become possible for us
to implement full-system LVM snapshotting for recordi
13 matches
Mail list logo
