Re: F28 System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1

2018-01-23 Thread Tom Hughes
On 23/01/18 08:37, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 23.01.2018 09:28, Tom Hughes wrote: None the less the man page for ld (at least on F27) says: defs Disallows undefined symbols in object files.  Undefined symbols in shared libraries are still allowed. which says that

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1

2018-01-23 Thread Florian Weimer
On 01/23/2018 09:28 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: On 23/01/18 07:44, Florian Weimer wrote: On 01/23/2018 08:16 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: This seems to be breaking things. I have so's failing to link due to this even though the man page says -zdefs doesn't affect shared libraries. Examples? It will

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1

2018-01-23 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 23.01.2018 09:28, Tom Hughes wrote: None the less the man page for ld (at least on F27) says:     defs     Disallows undefined symbols in object files.  Undefined symbols     in shared libraries are still allowed. which says that undefined symbols are allowed when linking a

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1

2018-01-23 Thread Tom Hughes
On 23/01/18 07:44, Florian Weimer wrote: On 01/23/2018 08:16 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: This seems to be breaking things. I have so's failing to link due to this even though the man page says -zdefs doesn't affect shared libraries. Examples? It will cause link failures because binutils now

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1

2018-01-22 Thread Florian Weimer
On 01/23/2018 08:16 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: This seems to be breaking things. I have so's failing to link due to this even though the man page says -zdefs doesn't affect shared libraries. Examples? It will cause link failures because binutils now reports that it does not have enough

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1

2018-01-22 Thread Tom Hughes
On 17/01/18 11:35, Florian Weimer wrote: On 01/09/2018 04:16 PM, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote:    I'm a bit perplexed by this change.  It looks like minor version   update, in such case it need no to be announced so widely.    On the other hand, you are changing the source.  According to the  

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1

2018-01-17 Thread Florian Weimer
On 01/09/2018 04:16 PM, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: I'm a bit perplexed by this change. It looks like minor version update, in such case it need no to be announced so widely. On the other hand, you are changing the source. According to the guidelines, changing source requires re-review.

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1

2018-01-09 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 09/01/18 16:16 +0100, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:11:31PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1 = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS2291 >> >> Change owner(s): >> * Nick Clifton >> >> Rebase the binutils package from

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1

2018-01-09 Thread Tomasz Torcz ️
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:11:31PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > = System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1 = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS2291 > > Change owner(s): > * Nick Clifton > > Rebase the binutils package from version 2.29 to version 2.29.1. This > will bring in the

F28 System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1

2018-01-09 Thread Jan Kurik
= System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS2291 Change owner(s): * Nick Clifton Rebase the binutils package from version 2.29 to version 2.29.1. This will bring in the bug-fixes from the 2.29.1 point release, but not add any new features. ==