On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 5:36 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>>
It attempts to sort using the id field, and if this isn't defined
other fields
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 5:36 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
[snip]
>>
>>> It attempts to sort using the id field, and if this isn't defined
>>> other fields are used as fallback in the following order: version,
>>> title, linux.
>>
>>
On Di, 26.06.18 10:33, Peter Jones (pjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 03:46:59PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > > That raises two questions:
> > > 1. Why isn't just the bls-snippet filename used as the key? It's
> > >necessarily unique and should be usable for
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 03:46:59PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> > That raises two questions:
>> > 1. Why isn't just the bls-snippet filename used as the key? It's
>> >necessarily unique and should be usable for the purpose of
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 03:46:59PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > That raises two questions:
> > 1. Why isn't just the bls-snippet filename used as the key? It's
> >necessarily unique and should be usable for the purpose of uniquely
> >identifying the boot entry without
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 04:40:41PM +0200, Ondřej Lysoněk wrote:
>> On 14.6.2018 12:06, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> I noticed the official spec defines a field named "machine-id". AFAICS,
>> GRUB2 doesn't implement that option, but it
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 04:40:41PM +0200, Ondřej Lysoněk wrote:
> On 14.6.2018 12:06, Jan Kurik wrote:
> I noticed the official spec defines a field named "machine-id". AFAICS,
> GRUB2 doesn't implement that option, but it supports a field named "id".
> Are these used for the same thing? If they