How about a middle ground, by splitting langpacks into several larger
groups (roman-alphabet+arabic+far-eastern?, asian+european?).
This way we wouldn't have to constantly twiddle with new packages and
keep the number of packages sane.
p
On 6/30/22 06:32, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 2:27 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 29/06/2022 19:00, Vipul Siddharth wrote:
> > Firefox langpacks, which have been bundled in the Fedora firefox base
> > package until now, will be moved to a firefox-langpacks subpackage.
>
> +1.
On 6/29/22 21:26, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 29/06/2022 19:00, Vipul Siddharth wrote:
Firefox langpacks, which have been bundled in the Fedora firefox base
package until now, will be moved to a firefox-langpacks subpackage.
+1. It might be better to split it even more:
On 29/06/2022 19:00, Vipul Siddharth wrote:
Firefox langpacks, which have been bundled in the Fedora firefox base
package until now, will be moved to a firefox-langpacks subpackage.
+1. It might be better to split it even more: firefox-langpack-%{lang}
and depend on the system-wide language
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This
proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora
Engineering Steering Committee.
== Summary ==
Firefox langpacks, which have been
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This
proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora
Engineering Steering Committee.
== Summary ==
Firefox langpacks, which have been
