On 7/6/23 10:14, Alessandro Astone wrote:
Is there any interest in providing the full older clang binary instead of just
compat libraries?
In my case, I'm working on an LLVM pass currently targeting LLVM15, and i can
use the llvm15 rpm to build it. But then I don't have a way to compile a C
Is there any interest in providing the full older clang binary instead of just
compat libraries?
In my case, I'm working on an LLVM pass currently targeting LLVM15, and i can
use the llvm15 rpm to build it. But then I don't have a way to compile a C
source into an LLVM15-compatible intermediate
On 6/27/23 04:06, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 27/06/2023 03:21, Tom Stellard wrote:
For this update, we're going to let package maintainers be responsible for
rebuilding their own packages if they are unable to use the compat libraries
for some reason. We can try to send an announcement
On 6/27/23 04:00, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 27/06/2023 03:19, Tom Stellard wrote:
We're trying to be more consistent with gcc and also upstream clang.
gcc installs some of these same libraries and some equivalent ones
into /usr/lib as well (/usr/lib/gcc/$TRIPLE/$MAJOR_VERSON).
What
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 5:06 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
> Some package maintainers are too lazy. They won't do anything even if
> you inform them in the ML.
That's harsh. Package maintainers are mostly volunteers, who spend
their free time on the project. If something happens to reduce
On 27/06/2023 03:21, Tom Stellard wrote:
For this update, we're going to let package maintainers be responsible for
rebuilding their own packages if they are unable to use the compat
libraries
for some reason. We can try to send an announcement when the side-tag
is ready.
Some package
On 27/06/2023 03:19, Tom Stellard wrote:
We're trying to be more consistent with gcc and also upstream clang.
gcc installs some of these same libraries and some equivalent ones
into /usr/lib as well (/usr/lib/gcc/$TRIPLE/$MAJOR_VERSON).
What about FindLLVM.cmake and its ${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX}?
On 27/06/2023 08:41, Tom Stellard wrote:
I mentioned this in a previous reply, but this is how other compilers like
gcc install their internal libraries and it's also where clang expects its
libraries to be installed.
Got it. Thanks.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On 6/26/23 22:44, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 26/06/2023 18:12, Aoife Moloney wrote:
* The Clang Resource Directory will be moved from /usr/lib64/clang/17/
to /usr/lib/clang/17/ this is the location of clang's internal headers
and runtime libraries like libomp and compiler-rt.
Why?
On 26/06/2023 18:12, Aoife Moloney wrote:
* The Clang Resource Directory will be moved from /usr/lib64/clang/17/
to /usr/lib/clang/17/ this is the location of clang's internal headers
and runtime libraries like libomp and compiler-rt.
Why? /usr/lib is a directory for 32-bit and architecture
On 6/26/23 12:50, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 26/06/2023 18:12, Aoife Moloney wrote:
Update all llvm sub-projects in Fedora Linux to version 17.
Please include iwyu and pocl packages to the side-tag rebuild too.
I will update pocl to version 4.0 soon in Rawhide.
For this update,
On 6/26/23 10:02, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 6:13 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-17
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback.
On 26/06/2023 18:12, Aoife Moloney wrote:
Update all llvm sub-projects in Fedora Linux to version 17.
Please include iwyu and pocl packages to the side-tag rebuild too.
I will update pocl to version 4.0 soon in Rawhide.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 6:13 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-17
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-17
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
==
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-17
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
==
16 matches
Mail list logo
