Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

2024-03-26 Thread Jan Kolarik
> > Maybe the "isn't entirely removingdnf4 from the system" is the root of > the issue. Is this planned? > For now, the preliminary plan is to keep the dnf4 stack in Fedora for another one following release, meaning if dnf5 switch is implemented in Fedora 41, dnf4 stack should be removed in

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

2024-03-26 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 26. 03. 24 v 8:02 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:39:35AM +0100, Jan Kolarik wrote: Previously, I had issues that migration from DNF4 to DNF5 left a lot of data in /var/cache. How is this going to be addressed? I don't think it is fair to leave those

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

2024-03-26 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:39:35AM +0100, Jan Kolarik wrote: > Previously, I had issues that migration from DNF4 to DNF5 left a lot of > > data in /var/cache. How is this going to be addressed? I don't think it is > > fair to leave those behind and waste disk space for regular users. > > > >

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

2024-03-26 Thread Jan Kolarik
Hi Zbyszek, Thanks for feedback. Second, I think that the lack of support for dnf5 in some areas is > going to be painful: in particular, as long as Anaconda and PackageKit > depend on dnf-3, we're going to be in a strange state the basic system > tools use two different versions of the code,

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

2024-03-25 Thread Jan Kolarik
Hello Vit, I don't understand this. So if GS going to use DNF, therefore the same > cache etc, or not? Or what other metadata PackageKit downloads on top of > DNF? > Yes, it will ultimately utilize the same cache. The paragraph you referenced is extracted from the "Early access for developmental

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

2024-03-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:46:47PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote: > == Summary == > Change the default package manager from dnf to dnf5. > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:jkolarik| Jan Kolarik]] > * Email: jkola...@redhat.com > > * Name: [[User:jmracek| Jaroslav Mracek]] > * Email:

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

2024-03-25 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 4:59 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Previously, I had issues that migration from DNF4 to DNF5 left a lot of data > in /var/cache. How is this going to be addressed? I don't think it is fair to > leave those behind and waste disk space for regular users. > Are you suggesting

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

2024-03-25 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 25. 03. 24 v 16:46 Aoife Moloney napsal(a): === Reduced footprint === The dnf5 package is a fully-featured package manager that doesn't require Python dependencies. It also reduces the number of software management tools in Fedora by replacing both the dnf and microdnf packages. The

F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

2024-03-25 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwitchToDnf5 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

2024-03-25 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwitchToDnf5 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering