On 06/01/2010 11:48 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said:
Not sure but I strongly suspect a change made to nss.spec to be the cause.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596840#c7
It's due to the fact that nss-softokn-freebl (actually,
Robert Relyea (rrel...@redhat.com) said:
It's due to the fact that nss-softokn-freebl (actually, *all* the nss/nspr
libraires) do not fit the normal library naming, so it's not explicitly
pulled for
multilib. For any update or release set that's composed with a package that
explicitly
On 06/02/2010 12:51 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Robert Relyea (rrel...@redhat.com) said:
It's due to the fact that nss-softokn-freebl (actually, *all* the nss/nspr
libraires) do not fit the normal library naming, so it's not explicitly
pulled for
multilib. For any update or release set that's
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said:
2) Wait for either of https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glibc-2.12-2
or
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-2.7.1-2.fc13 to be pushed to
stable, as those will pull in the i686 nss-softokn-freebl through library
dependencies.
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said:
Not sure but I strongly suspect a change made to nss.spec to be the cause.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596840#c7
It's due to the fact that nss-softokn-freebl (actually, *all* the nss/nspr
libraires) do not fit the normal library
1, 2010 11:48:41 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said:
Not sure but I strongly suspect a change made to nss.spec to be the cause.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596840#c7
It's due
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said:
I don't know when the 3 suffix was added. It may have been due to versioning
at some time but if I recall correctly we keep the 3 suffix to avoid a name
class with with the other nss package (name switch service I believe). Bob or
Kai can set me
, Kai
Engert keng...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2010 1:32:43 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues
I don't know when the 3 suffix was added. It may have been due to versioning at
some time but if I recall correctly we keep the 3 suffix to avoid
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said:
Getting back to
(i.e., libfreebl3.so instead of libfreebl.so.3)?
No danger of the name class I alluded for nss but we still want to preserve
the names so as not to break other dependent packages. I wonder if aliases
may help in any way. If we
@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2010 1:48:38 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues
On 29 May 2010 05:57, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Hi,
ATM, I am observing this:
# repoquery -qa 'nss-softokn-freebl*'
nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-19.fc13
On 29 May 2010 05:57, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Hi,
ATM, I am observing this:
# repoquery -qa 'nss-softokn-freebl*'
nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64
nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-17.fc13.i686
nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64
Hi,
ATM, I am observing this:
# repoquery -qa 'nss-softokn-freebl*'
nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64
nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-17.fc13.i686
nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64
nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.i686
12 matches
Mail list logo
