On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 08:46 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> I fully agree with not pushing things to stable unless they go towards
> stabilising the beta but can we please resume pushes to testing. At
> the moment there has been no pushes to testing and not having this for
> another week massively e
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 08:46 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> I fully agree with not pushing things to stable unless they go towards
>> stabilising the beta but can we please resume pushes to testing. At
>> the moment there has been no pushes
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 08:46 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> I fully agree with not pushing things to stable unless they go towards
> stabilising the beta but can we please resume pushes to testing. At
> the moment there has been no pushes to testing and not having this for
> another week massively
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Despite a heroic effort by developers and testers, we have not been able
> to reach Beta release criteria by the time of the Go / No Go meeting.
> There are still unresolved bugs and unknown test results. Because of
> this we've enacted a 1 w
Despite a heroic effort by developers and testers, we have not been able
to reach Beta release criteria by the time of the Go / No Go meeting.
There are still unresolved bugs and unknown test results. Because of
this we've enacted a 1 week slip of the Beta release date. This does
not mean we will
