Re: Fedora 17 Alpha status: open blockers, karma requests and blocker/NTH vote requests

2012-02-19 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 02/19/2012 01:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 19:54 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote: >> This actually wasn't a problem during my (very brief) attempt to >> install RC2. X was pretty obviously spanning both displays, but >> anaconda was only using a smaller region (1024x768?) of o

Re: Fedora 17 Alpha status: open blockers, karma requests and blocker/NTH vote requests

2012-02-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 19:54 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 02/17/2012 10:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > 8. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725219 - "anaconda should > > run in clone not span mode" > > > > This is a Greatest Hit, just waiting on some kind of a code fix from > > anacon

Re: Fedora 17 Alpha status: open blockers, karma requests and blocker/NTH vote requests

2012-02-18 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 02/17/2012 10:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > 8. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725219 - "anaconda should > run in clone not span mode" > > This is a Greatest Hit, just waiting on some kind of a code fix from > anaconda / X developers. This actually wasn't a problem during my (very

Fedora 17 Alpha status: open blockers, karma requests and blocker/NTH vote requests

2012-02-17 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey, folks. Here's another Alpha status report, focusing on open blocker/NTH issues and updates that need karma. As always, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers lists open blockers more or less in real time. Here's a quick summary of requested actions for the impatient: * anyo