On 06/09/2014 09:03 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 06/09/2014 08:31 PM, Jerry James wrote:
Another source of Java build failures may be that the
javapackages-tools package is not self-consistent about where maven
dep fragments should live; see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:49:05 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at
* Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com [2014-06-09 11:35]:
That's likely because both OpenJDK7 and OpenJDK8 both provide
java-devel (based on a the repo as it stood at yesterday's compose so
it doesn't include the mass rebuild packages):
# repoquery --whatprovides java-devel
* Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com [2014-06-09 12:01]:
In the xorg-x11-docs case it's explicitly BuildRequires:
java-1.7.0-openjdk;
Okay. Please don't do that. Use java-devel. Otherwise, this will break
on future updates to Java 8, 9 an later ones.
changing it to plain java-devel actually fixes
Hi,
On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
[2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html
Mass rebuild stopped ? or script stopped ?
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
[2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html
Mass rebuild stopped ? or script stopped ?
Not
On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
[2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html
Mass rebuild stopped ? or
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
[2]
Dne 8.6.2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 08:51:06AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
You can see the current list of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400
Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com wrote:
Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon.
If I do so sooner rather than later, would that clear the coda FTBFS,
or is it too late to remove the
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly
wrong in java land:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 16:35 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
That's likely because both OpenJDK7 and OpenJDK8 both provide
java-devel (based on a the repo as it stood at yesterday's compose so
it doesn't include the mass rebuild packages):
# repoquery --whatprovides java-devel
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:34:51AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400
Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com wrote:
Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon.
If I do so sooner rather than
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly
wrong in java land:
Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
org/apache/avalon/framework/configuration/ConfigurationException :
On 06/09/2014 08:31 PM, Jerry James wrote:
Another source of Java build failures may be that the
javapackages-tools package is not self-consistent about where maven
dep fragments should live; see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106919.
I believe that this is a documentation bug,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script tells me it is Checking 13923 builds... there is a
Il 08/06/2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script
Il 08/06/2014 20:20, punto...@libero.it ha scritto:
Il 08/06/2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script tells me it is Checking 13923 builds... there is a
very large number of failures[1]. There
On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 20:20:32 +0200
punto...@libero.it punto...@libero.it wrote:
hi
thanks for your work!
now i have some problems for rebuild my packages
DEBUG util.py:331: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum',
'--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f21-build-2154600-393050/root/',
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 12:37:00 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
lvm2's spec isn't very friendly to the rpmdev-bumpspec script that the
mass rebuild uses, so it is a bit messed up. They seem to redefine
'release' for every subpackage and the bumpspec script tries to
increment all of them and the
The srpm buildroot was still broken, this time by rpkg.
There was a rpkg build 2014-03-24 10:05:16 with a upstream version bump,
but it was untagged before going out in a rawhide compose and wasn't
ever fixed. Then the mass rebuild built it and landed it in the
buildroot.
If you commit things
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at
27 matches
Mail list logo
