On 09. 02. 21 18:28, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Miro Hrončok writes:
On 09. 02. 21 17:17, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Miro Hrončok writes:
Also note that it is a Pull Request, not a provenpackager mass pushing
changes.
Indeed, one step closer to doing this right :)
To doing what right? If I am do
- Original Message -
> From: "Robbie Harwood"
> To: "Charalampos Stratakis" , "Development discussions
> related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Miro Hrončok"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 5:30:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora 34 Cha
On 09. 02. 21 17:17, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Miro Hrončok writes:
On 09. 02. 21 1:54, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Miro Hrončok writes:
On 08. 02. 21 20:38, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Robbie Harwood writes:
Ben Cotton writes:
but doing this downstream only was never my intention. I am the
change ow
Charalampos Stratakis writes:
> Well it seems so. I mean I would get it to an extend if this wasn't a
> *PR*. But anyway yes a two-line diff apparently should be a patch and
> not a sed.
>
> Also according to the PR comments I'm "unwilling" to do that upstream.
That is not how that word is used
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> And now you are pissed that they didn't provide the two line diff in
> the the format that you like.
This belittling is uncalled for; your escalation here is not needed, nor
is it helpful to keeping the conversation on a technical track.
Thanks,
--Robbie
Miro Hrončok writes:
> On 09. 02. 21 1:54, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> Miro Hrončok writes:
>>> On 08. 02. 21 20:38, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Robbie Harwood writes:
> Ben Cotton writes:
>>>
>>> but doing this downstream only was never my intention. I am the
>>> change owner.
>>
>> You have
- Original Message -
> From: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Miro Hrončok"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 8:58:36 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora 34 Change: Deprecate python-mock (Sel
On 09. 02. 21 1:54, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Miro Hrončok writes:
On 08. 02. 21 20:38, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Robbie Harwood writes:
Ben Cotton writes:
A simple `sed` can be applied in `%prep` as a temporary (or even
permanent) downstream solution.
In most cases, performing the following r
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 07:54:00PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Miro Hrončok writes:
>
> > On 08. 02. 21 20:38, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> >> Robbie Harwood writes:
> >>
> >>> Ben Cotton writes:
> >>>
> A simple `sed` can be applied in `%prep` as a temporary (or even
> permanent) down
Miro Hrončok writes:
> On 08. 02. 21 20:38, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> Robbie Harwood writes:
>>
>>> Ben Cotton writes:
>>>
A simple `sed` can be applied in `%prep` as a temporary (or even
permanent) downstream solution.
In most cases, performing the following replacement sho
On 08. 02. 21 22:43, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 08. 02. 21 20:38, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Robbie Harwood writes:
Ben Cotton writes:
A simple `sed` can be applied in `%prep` as a temporary (or even
permanent) downstream solution.
In most cases, performing the following replacement should be enou
On 08. 02. 21 20:38, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Robbie Harwood writes:
Ben Cotton writes:
A simple `sed` can be applied in `%prep` as a temporary (or even
permanent) downstream solution.
In most cases, performing the following replacement should be enough:
s/^(\s*)import mock/\1from unittest
Robbie Harwood writes:
> Ben Cotton writes:
>
>> A simple `sed` can be applied in `%prep` as a temporary (or even
>> permanent) downstream solution.
>>
>> In most cases, performing the following replacement should be enough:
>>
>> s/^(\s*)import mock/\1from unittest import mock/
>> s/^(\s*)fro
On 19. 01. 21 16:46, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:43 AM Robbie Harwood wrote:
Ben Cotton writes:
A simple `sed` can be applied in `%prep` as a temporary (or even
permanent) downstream solution.
In most cases, performing the following replacement should be enough:
s/^(\s*
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:43 AM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Ben Cotton writes:
>
> > A simple `sed` can be applied in `%prep` as a temporary (or even
> > permanent) downstream solution.
> >
> > In most cases, performing the following replacement should be enough:
> >
> > s/^(\s*)import mock/\1fro
Ben Cotton writes:
> A simple `sed` can be applied in `%prep` as a temporary (or even
> permanent) downstream solution.
>
> In most cases, performing the following replacement should be enough:
>
> s/^(\s*)import mock/\1from unittest import mock/
> s/^(\s*)from mock import /\1from unittest.mock
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePythonMock
== Summary ==
The {{package|python-mock}} ({{package|python3-mock}}) package will be
[https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/
deprecated] in [[Releases/34|Fedora 34]]. The package is a standard
libr
17 matches
Mail list logo
