On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 04:17:02PM +0100, Patrik Novotny wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, this sounds rather complicated and risky.
> > Do I get this right that postgresql will bundle a copy of libpq,
> > and a separate unbundled libpq will be provided?
> >
> > Why not just include a specific Requires on a spec
>
> Hmm, this sounds rather complicated and risky.
> Do I get this right that postgresql will bundle a copy of libpq,
> and a separate unbundled libpq will be provided?
>
> Why not just include a specific Requires on a specific version of
> libpq? (Maybe something like
> Requires:libpq(%_isa)>=x.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PostgreSQL_13
On Tuesday, January 12, 2021 9:57:02 PM CET Ben Cotton wrote:
> As postgresql packages are built against the separated libpq package,
> an incompatibility between major versions can occur with new minor
> upstream releases. For example, when b
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 03:57:02PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PostgreSQL_13
>
>
> == Summary ==
> Update of PostgreSQL (`postgresql` and `libpq` components) in Fedora
> from version 12 to version 13 in the non-modular (main) builds.
>
> Also, there will be
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PostgreSQL_13
== Summary ==
Update of PostgreSQL (`postgresql` and `libpq` components) in Fedora
from version 12 to version 13 in the non-modular (main) builds.
Also, there will be a design change in postgresql modular packaging
regarding the external libpq
