On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 21:54 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11/24/20 9:52 PM, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 21:26 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 11/24/20 9:10 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rename_libusb_packages_and_deprecated_old_api
>
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 21:30 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11/24/20 9:10 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > * We begin sunsetting `libusb-compat` (i.e. current `libusb`).
>
> Consider deprecating it as part of the change:
>
>
On 11/24/20 9:52 PM, Benjamin Berg wrote:
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 21:26 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 11/24/20 9:10 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rename_libusb_packages_and_deprecated_old_api
== Summary ==
Rename `libusb` to `libusb-compat` and `libusbx` to
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 21:26 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11/24/20 9:10 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rename_libusb_packages_and_deprecated_old_api
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > Rename `libusb` to `libusb-compat` and `libusbx` to `libusb1`. Do
> > '''not'''
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:11 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> Rename `libusb` to `libusb-compat`
It was my recollection that I thought lib-compat package
naming was deprecated in favor of lib1 package
naming (or lib_1 if the last X was a number)
for a .1 soname example.
On 11/24/20 9:10 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
* We begin sunsetting `libusb-compat` (i.e. current `libusb`).
Consider deprecating it as part of the change:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On 11/24/20 9:10 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rename_libusb_packages_and_deprecated_old_api
== Summary ==
Rename `libusb` to `libusb-compat` and `libusbx` to `libusb1`. Do
'''not''' provide an automated update path for the old `libusb` build
dependency as
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rename_libusb_packages_and_deprecated_old_api
== Summary ==
Rename `libusb` to `libusb-compat` and `libusbx` to `libusb1`. Do
'''not''' provide an automated update path for the old `libusb` build
dependency as packages should–and likely can–be updated to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rename_libusb_packages_and_deprecated_old_api
== Summary ==
Rename `libusb` to `libusb-compat` and `libusbx` to `libusb1`. Do
'''not''' provide an automated update path for the old `libusb` build
dependency as packages should–and likely can–be updated to
