On 12/20/20 4:36 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Anyway, there would be some variation on what you have there, if that
is correct. It would be more ...
dnf repoquery --qf="%{source_name}" -a | grep ^nodejs- | grep -v
^nodejs-packaging% | sort -u -o nodejs.sources
vi nodejs.sources # remove the
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 3:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/18/20 3:28 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > We plan on only removing nodejs library leaves (packages that nothing
> > depends on for running or building).
>
> Thanks. That was not obvious from the proposal.
>
> > I've never ran that script
On 12/18/20 3:28 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
We plan on only removing nodejs library leaves (packages that nothing
depends on for running or building).
Thanks. That was not obvious from the proposal.
I've never ran that script looking for packages that nothing depends
on, and I'm not sure I'm
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 2:19 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> > >
> > > ...
> > > * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 9:32 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:18 AM Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this does not seem to be self-contained, since it seems to affect people
> > outside the SIG (it states that this is also affecting packages that are
> > not owned by the
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:45 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Scope ==
> > * Proposal owners:
> > We will go through the Fedora release and determine what nodejs
> > packages Fedora should package. We will implement nodejs library
> > bundling on those we
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:42 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 9:56 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>> == How To Test ==
> >>>
> >>> * Install all nodejs libraries in Fedora 33. Try to update to
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> >
> > ...
> > * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>
> Should there be an update of:
>
>
On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
We will go through the Fedora release and determine what nodejs
packages Fedora should package. We will implement nodejs library
bundling on those we already own. For those that we do not own, we
will work with their owners to
On 09.12.2020 19:44, Ben Cotton wrote:
The nodejs libraries have been approved to be bundled, and there is
infrastructure in place for the bundling to work properly.
And what about adding Provides: bundled(nodejs-foo) = version? There
were many nodejs packages with backdoors in npm. That's
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:18 AM Till Maas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this does not seem to be self-contained, since it seems to affect people
> outside the SIG (it states that this is also affecting packages that are
> not owned by the SIG).
>
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 01:44:30PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
Hi,
this does not seem to be self-contained, since it seems to affect people
outside the SIG (it states that this is also affecting packages that are
not owned by the SIG).
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 01:44:30PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
On Thursday, 10 December 2020 at 17:55, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 2:07 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, 10 December 2020 at 00:49, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 3:52 AM James Cassell
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, at 1:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> Is there really no better solution?
A general comment: I feel it is a shame that more language ecosystems
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 2:07 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 10 December 2020 at 00:49, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> > >
> > > ...
> > > * Policies and
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 5:39 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 09 December 2020 at 21:45, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:52 AM James Cassell
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, at 1:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > >
On Wednesday, 09 December 2020 at 21:45, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:52 AM James Cassell
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, at 1:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
[...]
> > Is there really no better solution?
>
On Thursday, 10 December 2020 at 00:49, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> >
> > ...
> > * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>
> Should there be an update of:
>
>
On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
...
* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
Should there be an update of:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/JavaScript/
On 12/9/20 9:56 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
== How To Test ==
* Install all nodejs libraries in Fedora 33. Try to update to Fedora 34.
What is the plan wrt Obsoletes of the removed packages?
--
Miro
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == How To Test ==
> >
> > * Install all nodejs libraries in Fedora 33. Try to update to Fedora 34.
>
> What is the plan wrt Obsoletes of the removed packages?
>
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
We do not
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:52 AM James Cassell
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, at 1:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > For Nodejs, Fedora should only package:
> > * The interpreter, development
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, at 1:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
>
> == Summary ==
>
> For Nodejs, Fedora should only package:
> * The interpreter, development headers/libraries, and the assorted
> tools to manage project-level
On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
== How To Test ==
* Install all nodejs libraries in Fedora 33. Try to update to Fedora 34.
What is the plan wrt Obsoletes of the removed packages?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
== Summary ==
For Nodejs, Fedora should only package:
* The interpreter, development headers/libraries, and the assorted
tools to manage project-level installations (NPM, yarn, etc.).
* Packages that provide binaries that
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
== Summary ==
For Nodejs, Fedora should only package:
* The interpreter, development headers/libraries, and the assorted
tools to manage project-level installations (NPM, yarn, etc.).
* Packages that provide binaries that
26 matches
Mail list logo
