On 4 November 2015 at 02:20, Toby Goodwin wrote:
> As well as Fedora itself, we need to get the infrastructure IPv6 ready.
> My company has developed an IPv6 health checker. Given a domain, it
> tests its nameservers, webservers, and mailservers for IPv6 readiness.
>
> Currently
- Original Message -
> From: "Zdenek Kabelac" <zkabe...@redhat.com>
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 1:43:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and impr
- Original Message -
> From: "Toby Goodwin" <t...@paccrat.org>
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 10:20:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> As well as Fedora itself, we n
On 3.11.2015 18:50, Moez Roy wrote:
> Hi Pavel Simerda,
>
> The IPv6 updates are breaking stuff (and probably increasing the
> attack surface):
>
> Bug 1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1
> in /etc/sysctl.conf
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231946
>
Dne 4.11.2015 v 13:24 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
On 3.11.2015 18:50, Moez Roy wrote:
Hi Pavel Simerda,
The IPv6 updates are breaking stuff (and probably increasing the
attack surface):
Bug 1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1
in /etc/sysctl.conf
On 04.11.2015 15:22, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Zdenek Kabelac" <zkabe...@redhat.com>
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, Novem
On 04 Nov 2015 09:20:00 -
Toby Goodwin wrote:
> As well as Fedora itself, we need to get the infrastructure IPv6
> ready. My company has developed an IPv6 health checker. Given a
> domain, it tests its nameservers, webservers, and mailservers for
> IPv6 readiness.
>
>
As well as Fedora itself, we need to get the infrastructure IPv6 ready.
My company has developed an IPv6 health checker. Given a domain, it
tests its nameservers, webservers, and mailservers for IPv6 readiness.
Currently fedoraproject.org scores 4 out of 9, so there's some room for
improvement!
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Scott Schmit wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 09:50:53AM -0800, Moez Roy wrote:
>> The IPv6 updates are breaking stuff (and probably increasing the
>> attack surface):
>>
>> Bug 1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1
- Original Message -
> From: "Chris Adams" <li...@cmadams.net>
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 9:30:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> Once upon a time, Zach Vi
So one thing I would suggest is testing ipv6 only environments. At
Facebook we are running into and fixing a whole host of problems with
NetworkManager, Anaconda, Dracut, etc. because they don't handle ipv6
only very well. It seems that having ipv4 enabled allows things to
work well enough that
Hi Pavel Simerda,
The IPv6 updates are breaking stuff (and probably increasing the
attack surface):
Bug 1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1
in /etc/sysctl.conf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231946
Bug 1251762 - dnssec-triggerd ignores
- Original Message -
> From: "Scott Schmit" <i.g...@comcast.net>
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 2:10:41 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:15:10AM
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Cronenworth" <m...@cchtml.com>
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 10:37:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> On 10/29/2015 10:15 AM,
>> In the above page:
>> * Network configuration: I see NetworkManager in there but nothing
>> about systemd-networkd
>
> I used browser search in that page and 'systemd' (which is the name
> of the source package that provides systemd-networkd) is listed.
I wasn't sure whether it meant systemd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/29/2015 10:15 AM, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> I am writing to Fedora development mailing lists to get opinions
> and ideas regarding our project on improving IPv6 support in
> Fedora across its components.
I'd be more than happy to work with some
> <pwout...@redhat.com>, "Tore Anderson" <t...@fud.no>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 6:56:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> So one thing I would suggest is testing ipv6 only environments. At
> Facebook we are run
lt;t...@fud.no>, "Tomas Hozza" <tho...@redhat.com>, "Paul
> Wouters" <pwout...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 6:50:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> Hi Pavel Simerda,
>
> The IPv
- Original Message -
> From: "Peter Robinson" <pbrobin...@gmail.com>
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 6:27:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IP
- Original Message -
> From: "Major Hayden" <ma...@mhtx.net>
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 8:24:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
&g
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:12:09PM -0500, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> You can of course have combinations. We can add that once we have
> specific test cases that would show importance of a standalone category
> for such a setup. Otherwise one would usually view IPv6 global and IPv6
> local
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 09:50:53AM -0800, Moez Roy wrote:
> The IPv6 updates are breaking stuff (and probably increasing the
> attack surface):
>
> Bug 1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1
> in /etc/sysctl.conf
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231946
>
On Thu Oct 29 15:15:10 UTC 2015, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> I am writing to Fedora development mailing lists to get opinions
> and ideas regarding our project on improving IPv6 support in
> Fedora across its components.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Networking
>
> Most prominent subpages:
>
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Peter Robinson"
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Networking
Hi,
thanks for your feedback.
> In the above page:
> * Network configuration: I see NetworkManager in there but nothing
> about systemd-networkd
I used browser search
Once upon a time, Dan Williams said:
> You can set this on a per-connection basis with NM. It just defaults to
> "unset", which then defaults to "on". You can also set a global default
> through /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf so that all new
> connections on your
On 10/29/2015 10:15 AM, Pavel Simerda wrote:
*https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Networking/Test_environment
Don't forget about 6to4[1]... everyone should have access to this unless your ISP
blocks the routes. It doesn't require an account or 3rd party host that the tunnels
require.
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 15:30 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Zach Villers said:
> > If it helps, Sixxs (https://www.sixxs.net/main/) is a very highly
> > recommended tunnel broker. I have not tried it and am not affiliated. I do
> > have ipv6 capability from my
Hi all,
I am writing to Fedora development mailing lists to get opinions
and ideas regarding our project on improving IPv6 support in
Fedora across its components.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Networking
Most prominent subpages:
*
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am writing to Fedora development mailing lists to get opinions
> and ideas regarding our project on improving IPv6 support in
> Fedora across its components.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Networking
If it helps, Sixxs (https://www.sixxs.net/main/) is a very highly
recommended tunnel broker. I have not tried it and am not affiliated. I do
have ipv6 capability from my isp, so could help with testing.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct
Once upon a time, Zach Villers said:
> If it helps, Sixxs (https://www.sixxs.net/main/) is a very highly
> recommended tunnel broker. I have not tried it and am not affiliated. I do
> have ipv6 capability from my isp, so could help with testing.
There's also Hurricane
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:15:10AM -0400, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> I am writing to Fedora development mailing lists to get opinions
> and ideas regarding our project on improving IPv6 support in
> Fedora across its components.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Networking
>
> Most prominent
32 matches
Mail list logo