Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-15 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/15/2010 11:00 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: Following the steps from deltarpm example (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange#Example_deltarpm) helps me to reproduce the DSO issue in local mock. Thanks. Hmm, however this would mean Matt's build-tree diverges from

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-15 Thread Matt Domsch
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:49:47AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 02/15/2010 11:00 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: Following the steps from deltarpm example (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange#Example_deltarpm) helps me to reproduce the DSO issue in local mock. This

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-15 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/15/2010 01:48 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:49:47AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 02/15/2010 11:00 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: Following the steps from deltarpm example (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange#Example_deltarpm) helps me to

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-15 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/15/2010 02:28 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 02/15/2010 01:48 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:49:47AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 02/15/2010 11:00 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: Following the steps from deltarpm example

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-14 Thread Paulo Cavalcanti
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote: Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 using rawhide from 2010-02-10 This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed. This is responsible for 446 failures noted below. See

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-14 Thread पराग़
Hi, fonts-ISO8859-2-1.0-22.fc12 (build/make) pnemade,fonts-sig,i18n-team,pnemade So why is this failed? See the successful koji scratch build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1986768 and then official build for F-13

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-14 Thread Matt Domsch
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:58:53AM +0530, Parag N() wrote: Hi, fonts-ISO8859-2-1.0-22.fc12 (build/make) pnemade,fonts-sig,i18n-team,pnemade So why is this failed? See the successful koji scratch build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1986768 and then

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-14 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/13/2010 04:50 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 using rawhide from 2010-02-10 This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed. This is responsible for 446 failures noted below. See

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Johan Cwiklinski
Le 13/02/2010 16:50, Matt Domsch a écrit : trasher: gcompris,homebank,tuxtype2 gcompris and homebank are already fixed and has been rebuilt. tuxtype2 will be soon, I'm working on it. Regards, Johan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29 -0600, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote: Of those expected to have worked... Without a bug filed: 659 -- glest-3.2.2-2.fc12 (build/make) bruno,bruno I believe I fixed glest on 2010-02-11. -- devel mailing list

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Matt Domsch
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 using rawhide from 2010-02-10 This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed. This is responsible for 446 failures noted below. See

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote: sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13 (missing_DSO_to_linker__http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking) itamarjp,cwickert,mschwendt How is package ownership determined? I have nothing to do anymore with Sylpheed for F-13 or

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote: sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13 (missing_DSO_to_linker__http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking) itamarjp,cwickert,mschwendt How is package

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Matt Domsch
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:53:20PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 using rawhide from 2010-02-10 This run includes the new

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread drago01
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote: Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 using rawhide from 2010-02-10 This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed. This is responsible for 446 failures noted below.  See

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Matt Domsch
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote: sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:04:33 -0600, Matt wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote: sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 02:50:35AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:04:33 -0600, Matt wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt