Re: Fedora retirement guidelines

2016-07-12 Thread James Hogarth
On 3 June 2016 at 09:31, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > > But I just had a user bitten by a change in behaviour between dnf and yum > > that was discovered here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506 > > > > The Bug

Re: Fedora retirement guidelines

2016-06-03 Thread Jaroslav Mracek
> But I just had a user bitten by a change in behaviour between dnf and yum > that was discovered here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506 > The Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506 has a high priority in DNF team and we hope that it will be fixed

Re: Fedora retirement guidelines

2016-06-02 Thread James Hogarth
On 2 June 2016 at 21:39, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:21 PM, James Hogarth > wrote: > > Right now the retirement guidelines state that you should only retire in > > branched (prior to freeze) and up to master... > > > > But I just had

Re: Fedora retirement guidelines

2016-06-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:21 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > Right now the retirement guidelines state that you should only retire in > branched (prior to freeze) and up to master... > > But I just had a user bitten by a change in behaviour between dnf and yum > that was

Fedora retirement guidelines

2016-06-02 Thread James Hogarth
Right now the retirement guidelines state that you should only retire in branched (prior to freeze) and up to master... But I just had a user bitten by a change in behaviour between dnf and yum that was discovered here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506 This is the bug raised