On 3 June 2016 at 09:31, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
>
> > But I just had a user bitten by a change in behaviour between dnf and yum
> > that was discovered here:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506
> >
>
> The Bug
> But I just had a user bitten by a change in behaviour between dnf and yum
> that was discovered here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506
>
The Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506 has a high priority
in DNF team and we hope that it will be fixed
On 2 June 2016 at 21:39, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:21 PM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
> > Right now the retirement guidelines state that you should only retire in
> > branched (prior to freeze) and up to master...
> >
> > But I just had
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:21 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> Right now the retirement guidelines state that you should only retire in
> branched (prior to freeze) and up to master...
>
> But I just had a user bitten by a change in behaviour between dnf and yum
> that was
Right now the retirement guidelines state that you should only retire in
branched (prior to freeze) and up to master...
But I just had a user bitten by a change in behaviour between dnf and yum
that was discovered here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506
This is the bug raised