Re: Fedora testing-20190523.0 compose check report

2019-05-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 14:51 -0400, Christopher wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:42 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:33 PM Christopher > > wrote: > > > Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ? > > > I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, and it's hard >

Re: Fedora testing-20190523.0 compose check report

2019-05-24 Thread Christopher
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:42 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:33 PM Christopher > wrote: > > > > Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ? > > I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, and it's hard > > to follow devel@ when it's so busy. It's already cross-

Re: Fedora testing-20190523.0 compose check report

2019-05-24 Thread Christopher
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:11 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 20:32 -0400, Christopher wrote: > > Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ? > > I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, > > Yes, they are. All packagers are involved in composes. Composes are >

Re: Fedora testing-20190523.0 compose check report

2019-05-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 20:32 -0400, Christopher wrote: > Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ? > I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, Yes, they are. All packagers are involved in composes. Composes are made from the packages built by packagers. :P Most of the bugs in comp

Re: Fedora testing-20190523.0 compose check report

2019-05-23 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:33 PM Christopher wrote: > > Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ? > I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, and it's hard > to follow devel@ when it's so busy. It's already cross-posting to > test@, that should be enough... perhaps there can be a

Re: Fedora testing-20190523.0 compose check report

2019-05-23 Thread Christopher
Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ? I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, and it's hard to follow devel@ when it's so busy. It's already cross-posting to test@, that should be enough... perhaps there can be a composes@ list for these? Then folks can opt in. On Thu, May

Fedora testing-20190523.0 compose check report

2019-05-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubsc