On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 14:51 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:42 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:33 PM Christopher
> > wrote:
> > > Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ?
> > > I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, and it's hard
>
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:42 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:33 PM Christopher
> wrote:
> >
> > Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ?
> > I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, and it's hard
> > to follow devel@ when it's so busy. It's already cross-
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:11 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 20:32 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ?
> > I don't think most packagers are involved in composes,
>
> Yes, they are. All packagers are involved in composes. Composes are
>
On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 20:32 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ?
> I don't think most packagers are involved in composes,
Yes, they are. All packagers are involved in composes. Composes are
made from the packages built by packagers. :P Most of the bugs in
comp
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:33 PM Christopher wrote:
>
> Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ?
> I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, and it's hard
> to follow devel@ when it's so busy. It's already cross-posting to
> test@, that should be enough... perhaps there can be a
Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ?
I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, and it's hard
to follow devel@ when it's so busy. It's already cross-posting to
test@, that should be enough... perhaps there can be a composes@ list
for these? Then folks can opt in.
On Thu, May
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
