Re: Fwd: Re: late generation of assemble code

2020-06-01 Thread Josh Stone
On 5/29/20 4:02 AM, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote: > * more space on the hard disks of the servers, because they contains > repositories only for LLVM IR packages rather than one by supported > architectures LLVM IR is not really arch-independent -- by the time you get to this level, all of the

Re: Fwd: Re: late generation of assemble code

2020-05-29 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Friday, May 29, 2020 5:15:45 PM MST Colin Walters wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2020, at 8:01 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > > WebAssembly is just in web browsers. It's not for normal software you'd > > install with your package manager. Unless I'm missing something? > > > You are indeed

Re: Fwd: Re: late generation of assemble code

2020-05-29 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, May 29, 2020, at 8:01 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > WebAssembly is just in web browsers. It's not for normal software you'd > install with your package manager. Unless I'm missing something? You are indeed missing https://webassembly.org/docs/non-web/ https://wasi.dev/ More random

Re: Fwd: Re: late generation of assemble code

2020-05-29 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Friday, May 29, 2020 1:56:16 PM MST Colin Walters wrote: > > Perhaps in Silverblue or other systems not designed to be a general > > purpose operating system? > > What, where did you get that? Silverblue is general purpose. Well, Silverblue is mostly GNOME. It's not meant for servers, etc.

Re: Fwd: Re: late generation of assemble code

2020-05-29 Thread Colin Walters
> Perhaps in Silverblue or other systems not designed to be a general purpose > operating system? What, where did you get that? Silverblue is general purpose. Anyways, my 2c on this topic: Once WebAssembly supports threads (it's coming) there's going to be a lot of interesting discussion

Re: Fwd: Re: late generation of assemble code

2020-05-29 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Friday, May 29, 2020 4:02:40 AM MST Paul Dufresne via devel wrote: > had forgotten to reply also to the list... doing it now: > > [cut the part where it was suggested to make package that contains LLVM > Intermediate Representation bitcode rather than CPU specific assembler] > > > On

Fwd: Re: late generation of assemble code

2020-05-29 Thread Paul Dufresne via devel
had forgotten to reply also to the list... doing it now: [cut the part where it was suggested to make package that contains LLVM Intermediate Representation bitcode rather than CPU specific assembler] On 2020-05-29 1:01 a.m., John M. Harris Jr wrote: Paul, What benefit do you see in the