Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

2010-12-02 Thread Matej Cepl
Dne 2.12.2010 08:26, Jakub Jelinek napsal(a): > Or don't use %{_smp_mflags} for make install, just for make. > Parallelized make install doesn't work for many packages, and doesn't buy > much anyway. Done http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2639180 And I sincerely hope this is the

Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

2010-12-01 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 12:03:42AM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:29 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'doc/examples/runExample.sh' > '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libgnome-java-2.12.7-2.fc14.1.i386/usr/share/doc/libgnome-java-2.12.7/examples/runExamp

Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

2010-12-01 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:29 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > libgnome-java failed to build > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2638084 I took a look out of curiosity, and this appears to be an intermittent problem that occurs when two instances of install(1) try to write to the same

Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

2010-12-01 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:43:09 pm Jesse Keating wrote: > On 12/1/10 10:16 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > Jesse Keating wrote: > >> I > >> don't really understand why a simple rebuild failed for these packages, > >> likely some movement in the buildroot contents. But I need somebody >

Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

2010-12-01 Thread Jesse Keating
On 12/1/10 10:16 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: >> I >> don't really understand why a simple rebuild failed for these packages, >> likely some movement in the buildroot contents. But I need somebody >> with more knowledge of the code base to attempt the build and translate >

Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

2010-12-01 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Jesse Keating wrote: > I > don't really understand why a simple rebuild failed for these packages, > likely some movement in the buildroot contents. But I need somebody > with more knowledge of the code base to attempt the build and translate > the error. I took the libgtk-java F14 SRPM and rebui

Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

2010-12-01 Thread Jesse Keating
On 12/1/10 2:57 AM, Stepan Kasal wrote: > Hello, > >> libglade-java - kasal - failed build >> libgnome-java - kasal - failed build >> libgtk-java - kasal - failed build > > these packages, together with cairo-java, glib-java, libgconf-java, > and libvte-java are part of java-gnome project. > > T

Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

2010-12-01 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, > libglade-java - kasal - failed build > libgnome-java - kasal - failed build > libgtk-java - kasal - failed build these packages, together with cairo-java, glib-java, libgconf-java, and libvte-java are part of java-gnome project. The versions we distribute were considered obsolete by the

GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

2010-11-30 Thread Jesse Keating
Yesterday I tagged a large number of my builds into dist-f14-updates. These were all builds that had no changes from the previous stable build except for buildroot content. These will be "live" as of the next (which may have already happened) updates push. The remaining packages which need builds