Re: Heads-up: python{,3}-sphinx-latex subpackage in Rawhide

2015-02-06 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Hi all, Follow-up on the Sphinx situation -- given that upstream didn't design Sphinx to be shipped with the LaTeX components missing (causing import errors), currently we're back to having all the files in python{,3}-sphinx. *However* it's probably a good idea to have the split in the future, so

Re: Heads-up: python{,3}-sphinx-latex subpackage in Rawhide

2015-01-23 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Hi Sergio, Indeed, that is the same bug. I'm away from the computer until Monday, so I'll do the stable release updates then - unless a comaintainer can do it over the weekend. The stable updates will probably be just bug fixes and won't introduce the packaging split or version bump. Cheers, -

Re: Heads-up: python{,3}-sphinx-latex subpackage in Rawhide

2015-01-23 Thread Sergio Pascual
Hello, 2015-01-23 11:04 GMT+01:00 Michel Alexandre Salim : > Hi all, > > From python-sphinx-1.2.2-6.fc22 onwards support for building LaTeX > documentation using Sphinx has been split off into the -latex subpackage > (so that Sphinx can be installed without pulling in TeXLive). > > (There's also

Heads-up: python{,3}-sphinx-latex subpackage in Rawhide

2015-01-23 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Hi all, >From python-sphinx-1.2.2-6.fc22 onwards support for building LaTeX documentation using Sphinx has been split off into the -latex subpackage (so that Sphinx can be installed without pulling in TeXLive). (There's also a bug discovered when doing this split -- the python3 build wasn't shipp