On 6/12/19 1:07 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 10. 06. 19 v 13:39 Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
More info and details available in the preliminary release notes at
https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.15.0 and the change
page linked at the start of this message.
Where can I read more about this:
>
On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 12:40 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 6/12/19 12:12 PM, Jitka Plesnikova wrote:
> > On 6/11/19 6:33 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > On 2019-06-10, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > > > As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.15, rpm 4.15-alpha
> > > > will be hitting rawh
Dne 10. 06. 19 v 13:39 Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
> More info and details available in the preliminary release notes at
> https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.15.0 and the change
> page linked at the start of this message.
Where can I read more about this:
> Add support for rootless chroot-operation
On 6/12/19 12:12 PM, Jitka Plesnikova wrote:
On 6/11/19 6:33 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2019-06-10, Panu Matilainen wrote:
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.15, rpm 4.15-alpha
will be hitting rawhide soon. A soname bump is involved but Igor kindly
promised to handle rebuilding
On 6/11/19 6:33 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2019-06-10, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.15, rpm 4.15-alpha
>> will be hitting rawhide soon. A soname bump is involved but Igor kindly
>> promised to handle rebuilding all dependent packages as part of th
On 2019-06-10, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.15, rpm 4.15-alpha
> will be hitting rawhide soon. A soname bump is involved but Igor kindly
> promised to handle rebuilding all dependent packages as part of the
> change, so no further action require
- Original Message -
> So apparently new RPM segfaults on some architectures randomly, I'm
> digging into it.
>
> In worst case, I'll tag old version and try to debug it locally.
>
> So far I can't reproduce it =(
Too late for any real bughunting by now, just untag and I'll look at it
So apparently new RPM segfaults on some architectures randomly, I'm
digging into it.
In worst case, I'll tag old version and try to debug it locally.
So far I can't reproduce it =(
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 2:36 PM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
>
> As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.1
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.15, rpm 4.15-alpha
will be hitting rawhide soon. A soname bump is involved but Igor kindly
promised to handle rebuilding all dependent packages as part of the
change, so no further action required from others on that account.
There are some
On 10. 06. 19 14:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 06. 19 14:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:28 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
A pile of language-specific macros and scripts have been eliminated from
rpm upstream, notably %__python and %__perl and everything built around
them, such
On 6/10/19 3:42 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 06. 19 14:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:28 AM Panu Matilainen
wrote:
A pile of language-specific macros and scripts have been eliminated from
rpm upstream, notably %__python and %__perl and everything built around
them, such a
On 10. 06. 19 14:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:28 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
A pile of language-specific macros and scripts have been eliminated from
rpm upstream, notably %__python and %__perl and everything built around
them, such as %python_sitelib and %perl_sitelib and t
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:28 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
>
>
> A pile of language-specific macros and scripts have been eliminated from
> rpm upstream, notably %__python and %__perl and everything built around
> them, such as %python_sitelib and %perl_sitelib and their relatives.
> Python packages
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.15, rpm 4.15-alpha
will be hitting rawhide soon. A soname bump is involved but Igor kindly
promised to handle rebuilding all dependent packages as part of the
change, so no further action required from others on that account.
There are some
14 matches
Mail list logo