On 29/07/20 10:23 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jonathan Wakely:
It's not about devtoolset. Installing CentOS 7 RPMs on Fedora rawhide
is outlandish. It won't work in general, because the CentOS RPMs have
dependencies on CentOS packages, and Fedora has different versions.
Steven has a
* Jonathan Wakely:
> It's not about devtoolset. Installing CentOS 7 RPMs on Fedora rawhide
> is outlandish. It won't work in general, because the CentOS RPMs have
> dependencies on CentOS packages, and Fedora has different versions.
Steven has a point, though. For software not built by Red Hat,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:03 PM Steven Munroe wrote:
>
> Dave Love writes:
>
> > It surprises me if that's IBM experience, and it's a bit worrying for our
> > new system.
>
> I no longer speak for IBM (retired) so more of a personal Linux for POWER
> opinion. But the Advance Toolchain (AT)
Dave Love writes:
> It surprises me if that's IBM experience, and it's a bit worrying for our
new system.
I no longer speak for IBM (retired) so more of a personal Linux for POWER
opinion. But the Advance Toolchain (AT)
Steven Munroe writes:
> I come from a different culture and experience. I am not as conversant
> in Fedorian as I should be. So I tend to misunderstand what is plain
> to you all.
Really, it's nothing specific to Fedora. The same would apply to any
GNU/Linux distro (or other OS with a typical
On 21/07/20 17:12 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
Dave Love; writes:
...
I'm pretty sure I said to do that a while ago, like I did when
testing the trivial patch that I didn't expect to cause such trouble.
You probably did say so ;)
I come from a different culture and experience. I am not as
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:14 AM Steven Munroe wrote:
>
> Dave Love; writes:
> ...
> > I'm pretty sure I said to do that a while ago, like I did when
> > testing the trivial patch that I didn't expect to cause such trouble.
>
> You probably did say so ;)
>
> I come from a different culture and
Dave Love; writes:
...
> I'm pretty sure I said to do that a while ago, like I did when
> testing the trivial patch that I didn't expect to cause such trouble.
You probably did say so ;)
I come from a different culture and experience. I am not as conversant
in Fedorian as I should be. So I tend
On 21/07/20 19:12 +0100, Dave Love wrote:
Jonathan Wakely writes:
On 20/07/20 16:01 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Why are you asking fedpkg to build for f33 if you are trying to
package something for el7 and el8?
I am trying to get better turn around for myself as I
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> On 20/07/20 16:01 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
>>Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> Why are you asking fedpkg to build for f33 if you are trying to
>>> package something for el7 and el8?
>>
>>I am trying to get better turn around for myself as I have local
>>access to a POWER8
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Or just stop trying to install devtoolset on Fedora.
+1
I did not realize that the OP was trying to install the packages (directly)
on a Fedora installation, as opposed to either a RHEL/CentOS installation or
a RHEL/CentOS chroot within a Fedora installation.
On 21/07/20 00:00 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Steven Munroe wrote:
$ sudo dnf install devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
devtoolset-9-gcc-c++-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
devtoolset-9-runtime-9.1-0.el7.ppc64le.rpm
devtoolset-9-libstdc++-devel-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
Installing individual RPMs
On 20/07/20 16:01 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Why are you asking fedpkg to build for f33 if you are trying to
package something for el7 and el8?
I am trying to get better turn around for myself as I have local
access to a POWER8 machine. And I was having difficulty
Steven Munroe wrote:
> $ sudo dnf install devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
> devtoolset-9-gcc-c++-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
> devtoolset-9-runtime-9.1-0.el7.ppc64le.rpm
> devtoolset-9-libstdc++-devel-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
Installing individual RPMs is a bad idea, because it means you have
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Why are you asking fedpkg to build for f33 if you are trying to
> package something for el7 and el8?
I am trying to get better turn around for myself as I have local
access to a POWER8 machine. And I was having difficulty debug the
weird failure I was seeing.
> That
On 20/07/20 13:09 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
Then I would have to learn what a "EL7 mock chroot" is. And how it is
man mock
different from "rpmbuild "
That builds the package on your local system, using the packages
available on your local system. If that's Fedora, then you're not
going
On 20/07/20 17:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
...
Why can't you install it in an On 20/07/20 17:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
...
Why can't you install it in an EL7 mock chroot, as suggested earlier?
There's nothing special about devtoolset here, EL7 packages just
aren't meant to work on F32.
On 20/07/20 17:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 20/07/20 10:54 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
That looks like a more complete list. Still having problems with dependencies:
$ sudo dnf install devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
devtoolset-9-gcc-c++-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
On 20/07/20 10:54 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
That looks like a more complete list. Still having problems with dependencies:
$ sudo dnf install devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
devtoolset-9-gcc-c++-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
devtoolset-9-runtime-9.1-0.el7.ppc64le.rpm
That looks like a more complete list. Still having problems with dependencies:
$ sudo dnf install devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
devtoolset-9-gcc-c++-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
devtoolset-9-runtime-9.1-0.el7.ppc64le.rpm
devtoolset-9-libstdc++-devel-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
Last metadata
Steven Munroe wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/x86_64/rh/
>
> I was looking for ppc64le but I think found a source at:
>
> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27175
The official location for ppc64le appears to be:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
>http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/x86_64/rh/
I was looking for ppc64le but I think found a source at:
https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27175
Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Steven Munroe wrote:
> So my project (pveclib) was requested for el7/8 which means building with
> devtoolset-9.
>
> With a spec file enabled for el7, the local rpmbuild's fail if you don't
> have devtoolset installed. The error message was less than helpful.
>
> So if you can use fedpkg
On 7/17/20 3:03 PM, Steven Munroe wrote:
So my project (pveclib) was requested for el7/8 which means building
with devtoolset-9.
With a spec file enabled for el7, the local rpmbuild's fail if you don't
have devtoolset installed. The error message was less than helpful.
So if you can use
So my project (pveclib) was requested for el7/8 which means building with
devtoolset-9.
With a spec file enabled for el7, the local rpmbuild's fail if you don't
have devtoolset installed. The error message was less than helpful.
So if you can use fedpkg scratch-build devtoolset is preinstalled.
25 matches
Mail list logo
