I wanted to elaborate on one of the ideas I threw out during that
discussion.
We (need to|should|strive really hard to) treat new packagers more like
new volunteers for fedora infrastructure. Except that we should accept
that packaging is really, really hard when you don't know where to start
and
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had
> > very interesting follow-up discussion.
> >
> > We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
> Right not for all SIGs but at least for those where its possible. Just
> see there are many such common pattern named packages are waiting in
> queue for their package review. I can think of some patterns like
> perl, python, golang, nodejs,
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 10:31 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
>>> b) fedora-review is run automatically by some bot/script just after review
>>> have been submitted.
>>
>> Can a new utility be written for this as I don't think that long
>> fedora-revie
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:32:28AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we
> had very interesting follow-up discussion.
So I kinda missed it, since for some reason, i tought this was
about financial sponsorship.
(Given that I forgot words
On 08/05/2016 10:31 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
>> b) fedora-review is run automatically by some bot/script just after review
>> have been submitted.
>
> Can a new utility be written for this as I don't think that long
> fedora-review output is helpful? Most checks have no markings in them.
> How can
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had
> very interesting follow-up discussion.
>
> We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to implement and
> may improve the process a lot. I am posting it
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had
> very interesting follow-up discussion.
>
> We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to implement
> and may improve the process a lot. I am posting it here so more people
> can see
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had
> very interesting follow-up discussion.
>
> We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to implement and
> may improve the process a lot. I am posti
Dne 5.8.2016 v 09:32 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we
> had very interesting follow-up discussion.
>
> We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to
> implement and may improve the process a lot. I am posting it here
I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had
very interesting follow-up discussion.
We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to implement
and may improve the process a lot. I am posting it here so more people
can see that and join the discussion.
11 matches
Mail list logo
