On Wed, 2023-02-15 at 14:02 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers
> that
> have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
> find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the final release,
> packagers who remain inactive will be
Il 16/02/23 21:45, Mattia Verga ha scritto:
> Il 16/02/23 20:26, Mattia Verga ha scritto:
>> Il 16/02/23 18:36, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:04:01AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:29 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> I'm a little surprised
Il 17/02/23 17:14, Ben Cotton ha scritto:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 1:48 AM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
>> During the weekend I can write down a script reusing partial code from
>> the find_inactive_packagers script and purge the ticket list from users
>> that showed activity in RH bugzilla,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 1:48 AM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> During the weekend I can write down a script reusing partial code from
> the find_inactive_packagers script and purge the ticket list from users
> that showed activity in RH bugzilla, let me know if you want me to
> proceed. Or I
Il 16/02/23 22:30, Ben Cotton ha scritto:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 3:45 PM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
>> This user should not have been detected as inactive if the Bugzilla
>> check was run. @Ben, maybe you forgot to set the BZ_API_KEY before
>> running the script?
> I didn't forget, I
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 3:45 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> This user should not have been detected as inactive if the Bugzilla
> check was run. @Ben, maybe you forgot to set the BZ_API_KEY before
> running the script?
I didn't forget, I intentionally did not. I thought we had already
Il 16/02/23 20:26, Mattia Verga ha scritto:
> Il 16/02/23 18:36, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:04:01AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:29 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
>>> wrote:
I'm a little surprised that the pagure ticket doesn't have the
Il 16/02/23 18:36, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:04:01AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:29 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
>> wrote:
>>> I'm a little surprised that the pagure ticket doesn't have the
>>> maintainer to whom it refers added as a subscriber to
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:04:01AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:29 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm a little surprised that the pagure ticket doesn't have the
> > maintainer to whom it refers added as a subscriber to the ticket.
>
> As far as I know, you can't
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:29 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> I'm a little surprised that the pagure ticket doesn't have the
> maintainer to whom it refers added as a subscriber to the ticket.
As far as I know, you can't subscribe others to a ticket the way you
can add a CC in Bugzilla. We could
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 5:20 PM Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> How many packages depend _only_ on people from this list? Eg are likely
> to be unmaintained ?
There's a command in the script that will check the impact, but I'm
going to hold off on running it for a bit. It takes a long time to
iterate
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 08:25, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 05:56, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:02:54PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> > In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that
>> > have been identified as inactive
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 05:56, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:02:54PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that
> > have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
> > find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:55:55AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:02:54PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that
> > have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
> > find-inactive-packagers
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:02:54PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that
> have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
> find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the final release,
> packagers who remain inactive will be
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023, Ben Cotton wrote:
For the curious, here are the stats from today's run:
### Found 2129 users in the packager group. ###
### Found 914 users with no activity in pagure/src.fp.org over the
last year. ###
### Found 845 users which also show no activity in Bodhi over the last
In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that
have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the final release,
packagers who remain inactive will be removed from the packager group.
(Note that pagure.io is one of the
In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that
have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the final release,
packagers who remain inactive will be removed from the packager group.
(Note that pagure.io is one of the
18 matches
Mail list logo
