06.05.2011, 11:10, "Misha Shnurapet" :
> 04.05.2011, 23:02, "Adam Jackson" ;:
>
>> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 11:36 +0900, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> We're absolutely never doing this by default. 0 means "never sync with
>> vertical re
04.05.2011, 23:02, "Adam Jackson" :
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 11:36 +0900, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> We're absolutely never doing this by default. 0 means "never sync with
> vertical retrace even if the app asks to".
>
> The other values for t
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 11:36 +0900, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
We're absolutely never doing this by default. 0 means "never sync with
vertical retrace even if the app asks to".
The other values for this option are:
1: Default swap interval is 0, but respect a
04.05.2011, 07:41, "Adam Jackson" :
> On 5/3/11 4:37 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
>> (b) is the i915 driver expected to provide better
>> video performance for this type of use in the future?
>
> Maybe. Much depends on what kind of video you're trying to play (which
> you haven't said). That particular c
On 5/3/11 4:37 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
> So my questions are: (a) does there exist a better video driver for
> this chip and/or
No. If there were, we'd be packaging it.
> (b) is the i915 driver expected to provide better
> video performance for this type of use in the future?
Maybe. Much depends o
Hi,
On an Atom-based netbook with an "Intel N10 Family Integrated Graphics
Controller" that is using the i915 driver, the system appears to be too
slow to play high-resolution video content (it is then CPU-bound).
This has been tested on F14.
Someone with the same netbook running Windows has no p
