On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:24 +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
On Thursday 25 November 2010 21:29:30 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
NetworkManager, connman, netcf, and a few
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Presenting wicked network configuration
===
This is the first public release of wicked, an experimental framework
for network configuration.
The project name is pretty close to wicd, also a
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:24:34AM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
On Thursday 25 November 2010 21:29:30 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
NetworkManager, connman, netcf, and a
On Thursday 25 November 2010 21:29:30 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
NetworkManager, connman, netcf, and a few more?
Indeed ... You don't explain how it's better than
Hi Olaf,
Thanks for posting about your project.
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:24 +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
1. ifcfg files are dead
Ok. But I think we want to be very careful with this. Yes, it's nice to
use structured data formats but IMO we want to make sure sysadmins can
still edit files by hand
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 04:02:28PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Olaf,
Thanks for posting about your project.
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:24 +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
1. ifcfg files are dead
Ok. But I think we want to be very careful with this. Yes, it's nice to
use structured data
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:24:34 +0100
Olaf Kirch o...@suse.de wrote:
3. Why not NetworkManager?
On the other hand, there's NetworkManager (and I'm getting to this point
because Pete Zaitcev brought this up). Right now, NetworkManager doesn't
handle bridges, bonds, infiniband, token ring -
Presenting wicked network configuration
===
This is the first public release of wicked, an experimental framework
for network configuration.
You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
NetworkManager, connman, netcf, and a few more?
The
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
NetworkManager, connman, netcf, and a few more?
Indeed ... You don't explain how it's better than netcf.
I notice a lot of hand-written C config file parsing in your
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 20:29:30 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
NetworkManager, connman, netcf, and a few more?
Indeed ... You don't explain how
On 25/11/10 17:24, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Presenting wicked network configuration
===
This is the first public release of wicked, an experimental framework
for network configuration.
You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 17:24 +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Presenting wicked network configuration
===
This is the first public release of wicked, an experimental framework
for network configuration.
You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:17:48PM +0100, nodata wrote:
On 25/11/10 17:24, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Presenting wicked network configuration
===
This is the first public release of wicked, an experimental framework
for network configuration.
You may
13 matches
Mail list logo
