On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:29:23 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> u...@radiopresenter.me.uk (unauthenticated) - 2010-03-08 13:36:44 (karma: 0)
> Error Type: Error Value: Error getting
> repository data for installed, repository not foundFile :
> /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:29:23 -0600, Michael wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Nah. The same way you could consider all bodhi comments "spam". If you
> > are the first commenter of a popular package, you receive lots of
> > notifications for all subsequent comments (where sometimes people
> > ev
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Nah. The same way you could consider all bodhi comments "spam". If you
> are the first commenter of a popular package, you receive lots of
> notifications for all subsequent comments (where sometimes people
> even use bodhi to argue about something).
Michael, how is posti
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:07:05 -0500, Josh wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:55:34AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> 2) Karma after it goes to stable is good for informational purposes, but it
> >> will not cause an update to get removed from Stable. We don't back out
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:55:34AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>Josh Boyer wrote:
>> 2) Karma after it goes to stable is good for informational purposes, but it
>> will not cause an update to get removed from Stable. We don't back out
>> updates
>> after that are pushed stable except in ver
Josh Boyer wrote:
> 2) Karma after it goes to stable is good for informational purposes, but it
> will not cause an update to get removed from Stable. We don't back out
> updates
> after that are pushed stable except in very rare cases.
I'll ask again:
Why does bodhi accept karma or comments a
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 01:36:18PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>what kind of karma threshold is set for the kernel?
>>
>>The page in bodhi says it has a karma of 9, but if you count it, it's
>>13+ and 10-
>>
>>And the kernel got -5 sin
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 01:36:18PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>what kind of karma threshold is set for the kernel?
>
>The page in bodhi says it has a karma of 9, but if you count it, it's
>13+ and 10-
>
>And the kernel got -5 since it's pushed to stable. Shouldn't that one
>stay out of sta
Hi,
what kind of karma threshold is set for the kernel?
The page in bodhi says it has a karma of 9, but if you count it, it's
13+ and 10-
And the kernel got -5 since it's pushed to stable. Shouldn't that one
stay out of stable for now?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-2.6.32.9-67.
