On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
Tom "Spot" Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit
files and shipping them.
Your work did not go unoticed!
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
2011/9/8 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
> On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
> Tom "Spot" Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit
> files and shipping them.
>
> Your work did not go unoticed!
I do agree in particular with respect to his labour to prov
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
wrote:
> 2011/9/8 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
>> On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
>> Tom "Spot" Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit
>> files and shipping them.
>>
>> Your work did not go unoti
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
> wrote:
>> 2011/9/8 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
>>> On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
>>> Tom "Spot" Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 14:47, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
> wrote:
>> 2011/9/8 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
>>> On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
>>> Tom "Spot" Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit
>
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 1:37 AM, John5342 wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 14:47, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/9/8 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
Tom "Spot" Ca
On 09/10/2011 12:15 PM, drago01 wrote:
> Well it seems upstream isn't really interested in fixing this so if we
> want chromium in fedora we'd have to ask FESCo for an exception.
I agree with that. If Spot is going to maintain it anyway, it might as
well as be in the repository and more accessi
drago01 wrote:
> Well it seems upstream isn't really interested in fixing this so if we
> want chromium in fedora we'd have to ask FESCo for an exception.
It means we need to fix it for them, even if it means heavily patching
Chromium (more heavily than what Spot is already doing).
Kevin
Dne 10.9.2011 17:23, Rahul Sundaram napsal(a):
> I agree with that. If Spot is going to maintain it anyway, it might as
> well as be in the repository and more accessible to end users with
> better security
Well, we could do a little salami tactic ... e.g., use system v8 which
is packaged and a
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 20:53 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 09/10/2011 12:15 PM, drago01 wrote:
> > Well it seems upstream isn't really interested in fixing this so if we
> > want chromium in fedora we'd have to ask FESCo for an exception.
>
> I agree with that. If Spot is going to maintain it
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 02:41:36PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Given that it's not a particularly vital package, since we have the
> somewhat more 'correct' Firefox, I don't think it's necessary to suspend
> our packaging standards to accept this kind of crappy code into Fedora.
Well, I under
Dne 13.9.2011 00:15, Jos Vos napsal(a):
> I just started to use it myself and it is in some situations *so much*
> faster than Firefox (on low-mem netbooks, for example), that I'm *very*
> glad to have Spot's packages. Looking at Google's Chrome RPM, I would
> definitely refuse to install it on an
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:05:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> The fact that it is important for Fedora users, doesn't mean it must be
> in the official Fedora repos (see MP3 codecs or other lovely programs in
> non-Fedora repos). [...]
I know. I was just reacting to Adam's argument "Given that
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 12:24 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:05:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
>
> > The fact that it is important for Fedora users, doesn't mean it must be
> > in the official Fedora repos (see MP3 codecs or other lovely programs in
> > non-Fedora repos). [...]
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:57:48AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> I believe I agree with you [1] - but to be pedantic (sorry!) what Spot
> is packaging is "Chromium", not "Chrome". AIUI, the former is Free
> Software, the latter is not.
OK, thanks for the clarification. Substitute Chrome by Chro
15 matches
Mail list logo
