2015-11-19 10:51 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :
> Hi,
>
> On 18-11-15 08:06, Germano Massullo wrote:
>
>> Hi, I would like to ask "lua" and "compat-lua" maintainers if it is
>> possible to have a packaged 5.2 lua version.
>> A use case? Upstream Darktable ships a bundled Lua version 5.2, and it is
>> n
Hi,
On 18-11-15 08:06, Germano Massullo wrote:
Hi, I would like to ask "lua" and "compat-lua" maintainers if it is
possible to have a packaged 5.2 lua version.
A use case? Upstream Darktable ships a bundled Lua version 5.2, and it is
not compatible with Lua 5.3. Fedora's Darktable does not ship
ompatible with Lua 5.3. Fedora's Darktable does not ship the bundled
> Lua to respect Fedora packaging rules.
If there are no other users of lua-5.2 in Fedora, then you could simply
replace the bundled source with latest upstream (currently 5.2.4) and ship
it bundled (recording the bund
Hi, I would like to ask "lua" and "compat-lua" maintainers if it is
possible to have a packaged 5.2 lua version.
A use case? Upstream Darktable ships a bundled Lua version 5.2, and it is
not compatible with Lua 5.3. Fedora's Darktable does not ship the bundled
Lua to respect Fedora packaging rules.
Just forwarding this reply. I sent it to Alek directly but my
CC to the list got bounced due to me not being subscribed.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Craig Barnes
Date: 13 May 2013 21:19
Subject: Re: lua 5.2
To: Alek Paunov
Cc: "Richard W.M. Jones"
On 12 May
On 05/13/2013 03:01 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 05/10/2013 04:55 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
>> You may have noticed me poking random packages, I'm preparing rawhide
>> (and only rawhide) for an update to lua 5.2.
>>
>> Please be patient. :)
>
> tolua++ does no
On 05/10/2013 04:55 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> You may have noticed me poking random packages, I'm preparing rawhide
> (and only rawhide) for an update to lua 5.2.
>
> Please be patient. :)
tolua++ does not have lua 5.2 support, and porting it is beyond my
skillset (I can do the
On 12.05.2013 00:10, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
FWIW the libguestfs transition to Lua 5.2 (done by the SuSE guys)
wasn't completely straightforward. A handful of APIs have been
removed or changed. These are the changes we had to make:
https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/c
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 04:55:11PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> You may have noticed me poking random packages, I'm preparing rawhide
> (and only rawhide) for an update to lua 5.2.
This is good news.
FWIW the libguestfs transition to Lua 5.2 (done by the SuSE guys)
wasn&#
w00t!
On May 10, 2013 3:55 PM, "Tom Callaway" wrote:
> You may have noticed me poking random packages, I'm preparing rawhide
> (and only rawhide) for an update to lua 5.2.
>
> Please be patient. :)
>
> ~tom
>
> ==
> Fedora Project
> --
> devel mail
You may have noticed me poking random packages, I'm preparing rawhide
(and only rawhide) for an update to lua 5.2.
Please be patient. :)
~tom
==
Fedora Project
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed 17 Apr 2013 08:13:31 AM PDT, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> lua bug with the current status and work being done:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815263
>
> -Toshio
>
>
Thanks Toshio,
Lets hope the issue will be resolved soon. It is a shame such issue
prevents updating other packa
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 02:51:58AM -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Upstream has released lua to 5.2. It would be nice if it was pushed into
> repository because
> gpick 0.2.5 requires that version.
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/watchl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Upstream has released lua to 5.2. It would be nice if it was pushed into
repository because
gpick 0.2.5 requires that version.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/watchlogs?taskID=5264534
- --
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedorapr
14 matches
Mail list logo
