On 11/15/2012 07:44 PM, Alek Paunov wrote:
LuaJIT is currently not available for our secondary architectures, so
this would need fixing first. (not available meaning exactly that,
there is no fallback to a slow C interpreter mode or something like
that.)
Oh, I completely forgot the
On 11/15/2012 01:49 AM, Alek Paunov wrote:
So, to me it seems natural joining all above together to start thinking
for replacing the classic python C bindings with thin textual or
bytecode(*) LuaJIT/FFI shims in benefit of things with great set of
dependencies like Anaconda (thanks to lupa, Lua
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/15/2012 01:49 AM, Alek Paunov wrote:
So, to me it seems natural joining all above together to start thinking
for replacing the classic python C bindings with thin textual or
bytecode(*) LuaJIT/FFI shims in
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:18 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/15/2012 01:49 AM, Alek Paunov wrote:
So, to me it seems natural joining all above together to start thinking
for replacing the classic python C
Hi Florian,
On 15.11.2012 13:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 11/15/2012 01:49 AM, Alek Paunov wrote:
So, to me it seems natural joining all above together to start thinking
for replacing the classic python C bindings with thin textual or
bytecode(*) LuaJIT/FFI shims in benefit of things with
On 12.11.2012 21:34, Steve Grubb wrote:
But the problem I see is a lot of libraries are wrapped by swig, which leaks
memory like a sieve. If swig didn't generate such leaky code, Python based
daemons wouldn't be as scary.
IMHO, Python is one of the best ways to express management logic. As
How much Python code are you proposing someone ports to Lua? ;-)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Alek Paunov a...@declera.com wrote:
On 12.11.2012 21:34, Steve Grubb wrote:
But the problem I see is a lot of libraries are wrapped by swig, which
leaks
memory like a sieve. If swig didn't
On 15.11.2012 04:51, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
How much Python code are you proposing someone ports to Lua? ;-)
I am proposing mostly porting C code to Lua/FFI (the code of the
problematic Python C bindings)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
