On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 07:07 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
On Thu 01 May 2014 01:34:43 PM CEST Jon Kent wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a GnuBatch package into Fedora, which is currently
being reviewed. One of
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 16:11 +0200, drago01 wrote:
Another (relatively common) problem is the parallelization (-j4)
tripping the makefile up. I.e. dependencies for some targets are
incomplete and config.h is not yet generated when they execute.
Any time this turns out to be the problem,
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 07:07 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
On Thu 01 May 2014 01:34:43 PM CEST Jon Kent wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a GnuBatch package into Fedora, which is currently
being reviewed. One of the points raised in the review was that I was
running make without any
Hi,
I'm trying to get a GnuBatch package into Fedora, which is currently
being reviewed. One of the points raised in the review was that I was
running make without any Fedora options. I've added these as requested
so the make line now looks like:
make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS=%{optflags}
On Thu, 1 May 2014 12:34:43 +0100
Jon Kent jon.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a GnuBatch package into Fedora, which is currently
being reviewed. One of the points raised in the review was that I was
running make without any Fedora options. I've added these as requested
so the
Thats an idea, hadn't thought of that. Will take a look.
Thanks
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2014 12:34:43 +0100
Jon Kent jon.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a GnuBatch package into Fedora, which is currently
being
On Thu 01 May 2014 01:34:43 PM CEST Jon Kent wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a GnuBatch package into Fedora, which is currently
being reviewed. One of the points raised in the review was that I was
running make without any Fedora options. I've added these as requested
so the make line now looks
