Re: Many directories without owning packages

> Zbigniew, thanks for the prompt fix, but there goes my dream to file a > bug against systemd :-p Don't worry, we already have plenty :) > I'm personally waiting for Fedora 25 to be out, and after upgrading I > will start looking at the mass bug filing process. It'd be nice if > people with

Re: Many directories without owning packages

On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 04:00:21PM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > repositories have this ownership issue. Filing bugs may not be the > best thing to do if 7% of the whole package collection have ownership > issues. It might be something to file a ticket with FESCo about and to work with a

Re: Many directories without owning packages

On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 04:00:21PM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > I'm personally waiting for Fedora 25 to be out, and after upgrading I > will start looking at the mass bug filing process. It'd be nice if Since F25 is branched off of what-will-become-F26 already, I suggest looking at Rawhide.

Re: Many directories without owning packages

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Fixed in systemd-232-2.fc26. Zbigniew, thanks for the prompt fix, but there goes my dream to file a bug against systemd :-p I'm personally waiting for Fedora 25 to be out, and after upgrading I will start

Re: Many directories without owning packages

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:51:18PM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > [1] https://paste.fedoraproject.org/467731/14780369/ systemd-229-16.fc24.x86_64 |-- /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.hostname1.conf |-- /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.locale1.conf |--

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Many directories without owning packages

On 02/11/16 17:49, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: I'm still curious if this elegant shell code could be used to enhance the current tests f-r has. As noted, they are extremely expensive, in a class of it's own besides the build and install tasks. I don't think so, f-r works on packages built from

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Many directories without owning packages

> I'm still curious if this elegant shell code could be used to enhance the current tests f-r has. As noted, they are extremely expensive, in a class of it's own besides the build and install tasks. I don't think so, f-r works on packages built from a source rpm. This on the other hand is a

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Many directories without owning packages

On 02/11/16 15:55, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Tuesday, 01 November 2016 at 13:05, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: Actually, a check for this would be useful to have in both fedora-review Actually, f-r is testing this since long. However, the review approach is different: does this

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Many directories without owning packages

On Tuesday, 01 November 2016 at 13:05, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Hi, > > This is mass bug filing material, I have been under the weather > shortly after the first message on this thread but I have made more > progress now. Enough to CC the packaging list too. Actually, a check for this would be

Re: Many directories without owning packages

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 01:05:03PM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: >> Example output for the /boot sub-tree on my daily driver: >> >> grub2-efi-2.02-0.34.fc24.x86_64 >> └── /boot/efi/EFI/fedora >>

Re: Many directories without owning packages

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 01:05:03PM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Example output for the /boot sub-tree on my daily driver: > > grub2-efi-2.02-0.34.fc24.x86_64 > └── /boot/efi/EFI/fedora > mactel-boot-0.9-13.fc24.x86_64 > ├── /boot/efi/.VolumeIcon.icns > ├──

Re: Many directories without owning packages

Hi, This is mass bug filing material, I have been under the weather shortly after the first message on this thread but I have made more progress now. Enough to CC the packaging list too. On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday,

Re: Many directories without owning packages

On Thursday, 06 October 2016 at 18:58, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Hello, > > I was surprised to see /usr/share/texlive on my system although I > remembered very well removing it months ago. It turned out to be > caused by two rpmsave files, although some *empty* directories weren't > removed:

Many directories without owning packages

Hello, I was surprised to see /usr/share/texlive on my system although I remembered very well removing it months ago. It turned out to be caused by two rpmsave files, although some *empty* directories weren't removed: $ find /usr/share/texlive/ /usr/share/texlive/ /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist