Dne 29. 01. 24 v 13:58 Ben Beasley napsal(a):
Could you please double-check this change? I noticed that in spacebar, LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-GPL was the actual name
of a license file in the %files section; this was replaced with (GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only), which causes the
package to FTBFS
Miroslav,
Could you please double-check this change? I noticed that in spacebar,
LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-GPL was the actual name of a license file in the
%files section; this was replaced with (GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only),
which causes the package to FTBFS.
Looking at the grep output you o
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 4:52 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Lots of packages in Fedora use license LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-GPL and
> LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-LGPL. These licenses were never approved. It took
> lots of time to discuss it and document it. We finally come with:
>
> https://docs.fedora
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:52:16AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > KDE project uses LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-* licenses. This was discussed
> > here and here. The consensus is that upstream license
> > LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-GPL should be replaced in Fedora by GPL-2.0-only OR
> > GPL-3.0-only. And
Lots of packages in Fedora use license LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-GPL and LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-LGPL. These licenses were
never approved. It took lots of time to discuss it and document it. We finally come with:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/#_licenseref_kde_
