Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-21 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hi! Side tag was merged, java-11-openjdk now should be system JDK. Don't hesitate to reach me if you encounter some misbehaving! J. On 7/11/20 10:24 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: > Hello! > > toatal packages: 610 > passed: 427 > failed: 176 > > From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr

Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-21 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hi! Side tag was merged, java-11-openjdk now should be system JDK. Don't hesitate to reach me if you encounter some misbehaving! J. On 7/11/20 10:24 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: > Hello! > > toatal packages: 610 > passed: 427 > failed: 176 > > From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:25 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > >> > >> Any update? Any thoughts on when you want to merge the f33-java11 side tag > >> back into rawhide? > > done > >> > > > > BTW There are some packages, e.g. built by ant with no sauce/target level > > specified at all, that are > >

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-21 Thread Jiri Vanek
>> >> Any update? Any thoughts on when you want to merge the f33-java11 side tag >> back into rawhide? done >> > > BTW There are some packages, e.g. built by ant with no sauce/target level > specified at all, that are > built with Java 11-level bytecode. > > This is bad because if there is a

Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-20 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 2:24 PM Mat Booth wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 09:34, Christian Heimes wrote: > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > toatal packages: 610 > > > passed: 427 > > > failed: 176 > > > > > > From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now > > > are thus

Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-20 Thread Mat Booth
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 09:34, Christian Heimes wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > toatal packages: 610 > > passed: 427 > > failed: 176 > > > > From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are > > thus failing > > from two > > reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch

Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-20 Thread judovana
Hi! Sorry., I had missed your email. Lets continue the discussion in the ticket https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2449 you had risen. In the mass rebuilds, I was working with packages with selected java dependencies or packaes I know about tat had to be included. dogtag pki have likely only

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-17 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 11:19, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:42:45 +0200 > Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > Could someone with superpowers cancel the following task for me? > > Thanks. > > done, it has already failed on i686 Yeah, that's why I wanted to cancel it. The task was launched

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-17 Thread Dan Horák
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:42:45 +0200 Iñaki Ucar wrote: > Could someone with superpowers cancel the following task for me? > Thanks. done, it has already failed on i686 Dan > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47330918 > > On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 09:44, Fabio

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-17 Thread Iñaki Ucar
Could someone with superpowers cancel the following task for me? Thanks. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47330918 On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 09:44, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:55 PM Mat Booth wrote: > > Any update? Any thoughts on when you want to merge

Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-17 Thread Christian Heimes
> Hello! > > toatal packages: 610 > passed: 427 > failed: 176 > > From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are > thus failing > from two > reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to > FTBF bugs for > those 29 > pacakges, > > >

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:55 PM Mat Booth wrote: > Any update? Any thoughts on when you want to merge the f33-java11 side tag > back into rawhide? I second this, please don't wait two weeks [0] for merging the side tag, it's only going to cause merge conflict problems with packages that get

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-16 Thread Mat Booth
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 16:54, Mat Booth wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:14, Jiri Vanek wrote: > > > > > > > > A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g. plexus-velocity failed with this: > > > > > > DEBUG util.py:621: Errors during downloading metadata for

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-15 Thread Mat Booth
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:14, Jiri Vanek wrote: > > > > > A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g. plexus-velocity failed with this: > > > > DEBUG util.py:621: Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'build': > > DEBUG util.py:621:- Curl error (18):

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-13 Thread Jiri Vanek
> > A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g. > plexus-velocity failed with this: > > DEBUG util.py:621:  Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'build': > DEBUG util.py:621:    - Curl error (18): Transferred a partial file for >

Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-13 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hello! toatal packages: 610 passed: 427 failed: 176 From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are thus failing from two reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to FTBF bugs for those 29 pacakges, In Monday, or as other duties

Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-13 Thread Jiri Vanek
Hello! toatal packages: 610 passed: 427 failed: 176 From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are thus failing from two reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to FTBF bugs for those 29 pacakges, In Monday, or as other duties

Re: [fedora-java] Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-13 Thread Mat Booth
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 09:24, Jiri Vanek wrote: > > Hello! > > toatal packages: 610 > passed: 427 > failed: 176 > > From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are thus failing from two > reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to FTBF

Re: [fedora-java] Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

2020-07-12 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 10:26 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > Hello! > > toatal packages: 610 > passed: 427 > failed: 176 > > From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are > thus failing from two > reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to