Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-28 Thread Andreas Schwab
Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net writes: From a recent default install of F14: ps auxw | wc -l 124 How many of those are kernel threads? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E And now for something completely

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-28 Thread Larry Vaden
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Andreas Schwab sch...@redhat.com wrote: Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net writes: From a recent default install of F14: ps auxw | wc -l 124 How many of those are kernel threads? I dunno but if you will suggest a mod to the CLI command I'll run it and report

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-27 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: On 2/25/11 12:51 PM, Chris Lumens wrote: This was the same realization that led to the removal of the labeled minimal install, too many people just wanted to argue over the meaning of the term minimal. ? There's still

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-27 Thread Larry Vaden
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: If it includes sendmail its not minimal enough ;-) From a recent default install of F14: ps auxw | wc -l 124 Several of the BSDish distros achieve 30-50 as a minimal install. e.g., on RHEL. IMHO some thought should

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-27 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 02/25/2011 03:07 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: Heh, have we started getting bug reports about it not being minimal enough or it being too minimal yet? Do you want them? ;-) -- Ian Pilcher

Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 09:53 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: This was the same realization that led to the removal of the labeled minimal install, too many people just wanted to argue over the meaning of the term minimal. ? There's still a 'minimal' radio button in the installer at the package

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-25 Thread MichaƂ Piotrowski
2011/2/25 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 09:53 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: This was the same realization that led to the removal of the labeled minimal install, too many people just wanted to argue over the meaning of the term minimal. ? There's still a 'minimal'

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-25 Thread Chris Lumens
This was the same realization that led to the removal of the labeled minimal install, too many people just wanted to argue over the meaning of the term minimal. ? There's still a 'minimal' radio button in the installer at the package set selection stage. I know, I just clicked on it

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-25 Thread Jesse Keating
On 2/25/11 12:51 PM, Chris Lumens wrote: This was the same realization that led to the removal of the labeled minimal install, too many people just wanted to argue over the meaning of the term minimal. ? There's still a 'minimal' radio button in the installer at the package set selection