On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:36:44PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > I'd try to write a page generator that'd turn appdata files into
> > html. Might be useful for more than fonts.
>
>
>
> >
> > I'd try to write a page generator that'd turn appdata files into
> > html. Might be useful for more than fonts. That doesn't even seem
> > like that much work, to write such a script and have it run once a
> > week and update the html for all updated packages and push it out to
> > a
Hi,
fedora-packages is already using the appdata to get the icons of the
applications. The indexing of the search database is fetching an xml file [1]
that contains the appdata but I am not sure how this file is actually produced.
[1] :
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:05:10PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 08:34:35PM +, Will Crawford wrote:
> >> On 23 November 2017 at 13:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >>
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Usually it's because the font does something crazy and can't be
> rendered by pango-cairo correctly. The "generate a PNG from a TTF"
> functionality is a hair-raising mixture of cairo, pango, freetype2 and
> fontconfig.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> I think we should consider getting rid of this requirement. Updating
> wiki pages is quite a bit of work, and we have better mechanisms to
> advertise stuff to users that didn't exist a few years ago. Apart
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 08:34:35PM +, Will Crawford wrote:
>> On 23 November 2017 at 13:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>> [...]
>> > I think we should consider getting rid
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> We fixed the emoji font generation yesterday by chance:
> https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/commit/7e597065a8024743dde63354355388e7ac7f9855
maybe good to have one for math? which is und-zmth.
>
>> Also, most
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 08:34:35PM +, Will Crawford wrote:
> On 23 November 2017 at 13:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> [...]
> > I think we should consider getting rid of this requirement. Updating
> > wiki pages is quite a bit of work, and we have better
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 02:37:56PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > I attached a screenshot from gnome-software-3.26.1-3.fc27.x86_64 for a
> > random font. This _is_ already pretty good, but it'd be nice to
On 23 November 2017 at 20:34, Will Crawford wrote:
> There are still some dinosaurs who don't use GNOME.
AppStream is a cross distro and cross desktop specification. It's used
by Muon, Discover and Apper on KDE, AppCenter on Elementary OS and
also desktop neutral
On 23 November 2017 at 13:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
[...]
> I think we should consider getting rid of this requirement. Updating
> wiki pages is quite a bit of work, and we have better mechanisms to
> advertise stuff to users that didn't exist a few years ago.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 04:16:27PM +0530, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 03:44:05PM +0530, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> >> All of fonts is supposed to have an information page for their fonts
> >> at wiki
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017, at 11:46 AM, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 03:44:05PM +0530, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> >> All of fonts is supposed to have an information page for their
> >> fonts> >> at wiki
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 03:44:05PM +0530, Akira TAGOH wrote:
>> All of fonts is supposed to have an information page for their fonts
>> at wiki based on the template[1] according to the package
>> lifecycle[2].
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 03:44:05PM +0530, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> All of fonts is supposed to have an information page for their fonts
> at wiki based on the template[1] according to the package
> lifecycle[2]. however some of them doesn't have. so just tried to pick
> them up and inform you to get
On 11/21/2017 11:14 AM, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> zdohnal ghostscript-fonts
>
ghostscript-fonts is deprecated by urw-fonts and urw-base35-fonts in
Fedora 27+ and is going to be retired for them, so I won't create wiki
page for it.
--
Zdenek Dohnal
Associate Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech -
On Tuesday, 21 November 2017 at 11:14, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All of fonts is supposed to have an information page for their fonts
> at wiki based on the template[1] according to the package
> lifecycle[2]. however some of them doesn't have. so just tried to pick
> them up and inform you to
Hi,
All of fonts is supposed to have an information page for their fonts
at wiki based on the template[1] according to the package
lifecycle[2]. however some of them doesn't have. so just tried to pick
them up and inform you to get one there.
Please see the following source package list which
19 matches
Mail list logo